arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2607.08321cs.CV

深度视觉模型中的纹理表示:比较卷积神经网络、视觉Transformer和人类感知

Texture Representations in Deep Vision Models: Comparing CNNs, Vision Transformers, and Human Perception

Department of Neuroscience International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) Trieste Italy(神经科学系国际先进研究学院(SISSA)特里埃斯特意大利);Department of Language and Translation Sciences Pompeu Fabra University Barcelona Spain(语言与翻译科学系庞培法布拉大学巴塞罗那西班牙);ICREA Barcelona Spain(ICREA巴塞罗那西班牙);Department of Data Science International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) Trieste Italy(数据科学系国际先进研究学院(SISSA)特里埃斯特意大利)

Ludovica de Paolis, Marco Baroni, Alessandro Laio, Eugenio Piasini

AI总结:

研究聚焦视觉的纹理感知,通过三种算法生成不同复杂度纹理,量化CNN和ViTs内部表示信息并与人类数据比较,发现ViTs在纹理表示上有优势,能更好捕捉人类视觉处理纹理模式的方式,其表示受网络架构驱动。

摘要:

在计算视觉科学中,卷积神经网络(CNNs)因其能与人类和动物的神经及行为数据对齐,成为生物视觉的流行模型。但对于超越基于明确语义内容的典型物体识别范式的视觉任务,这种对齐程度尚不明晰。本研究聚焦视觉的纹理感知方面,采用三种算法从同一源图像生成不同复杂度纹理,用基于秩的统计量化CNN和三种视觉Transformer(ViTs)内部表示编码的信息,并与人类心理物理学数据推断的表示作比较。发现不同ViTs间纹理表示对齐,ViTs与CNN间则不然;不同复杂度纹理在ViTs中形成相似表示;从ViTs表示比CNN表示能更好预测人类纹理识别表现。这些结果表明ViTs可能比CNNs更忠实地捕捉人类视觉处理纹理模式的方式,且计算模型中纹理刺激的表示可能受网络架构驱动。

英文摘要:

In computational vision science, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have emerged as a popular model of biological vision because of the alignment they can exhibit with neural and behavioral data in humans and animals. However, it remains unclear to what extent this alignment persists for visual tasks that extend beyond the canonical object recognition paradigm based on well defined semantic content. In this study, we diverge from the common object-centric view by focusing on another aspect of vision: texture perception. We consider textures of different complexity generated with three different algorithms from the same source images. Using a rank-based statistic, we quantify the information encoded in the internal representations of a CNN and three Vision Transformers (ViTs), and we compare the similarity of these representations to those inferred from human psychophysics data. We find that the representation of textures is aligned in different ViTs, but not between the ViTs and the CNN; that ViTs form similar representations for textures of different complexity; that human performance in recognizing textures can be better predicted from ViTs representations rather than CNN representations. Taken together, these results suggest that ViTs may capture more faithfully than CNNs how texture patterns are visually processed by humans, and that the representations of texture stimuli in computational models may be driven by the network architecture.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑