arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2606.08065physics.med-ph

自由呼吸GRASP MRI在肝癌放疗中与4D-CT精确相位匹配以表征运动中的作用

The Role of Free-breathing GRASP MRI in Accurate Phase Matching with 4D-CT for Motion Representation in Liver Cancer Radiotherapy

Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology(华中科技大学同济医学院同济医院);Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College(中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院/国家癌症中心/国家临床医学研究中心放射肿瘤科);School of Electronic Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(北京邮电大学电子工程学院)

Junchao Li, Shengqi Chen, Guohua Wu, Jianrong Dai, Jiayun Chen, Fei Liu

AI总结:

研究自由呼吸GRASP MRI能否代表肝癌立体定向放疗中的呼吸运动,发现其仅在30%-60%呼吸相位(最佳50%)准确表征运动,需结合4D-CT或动态成像。

摘要:

目的:确定自由呼吸黄金角径向稀疏并行(GRASP)磁共振成像(MRI)能否代表接受立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)的肝脏恶性肿瘤患者的呼吸诱导器官运动。方法:对54例接受肝脏SBRT的患者进行回顾性分析。使用四维计算机断层扫描(4D-CT)——运动评估的金标准——来表征肝脏肿瘤运动。使用内部配准程序对自由呼吸GRASP MRI与4D-CT的每个呼吸相位进行图像融合,融合质量通过最大互相关系数(MCC)量化。验证涉及两名盲法放射肿瘤学家:一名使用Eclipse内置模块重复图像融合,另一名按五点量表评估临床相关性。结果:4D-CT的50%呼吸相位与GRASP MRI的融合质量最高,与30%(P=0.106)、40%(P=0.632)和60%(P=0.792)相位相比无显著差异。相反,超出中呼吸窗(30%-60%)后融合质量显著下降,在0%、10%、20%、80%和90%相位融合较差(P<0.001)。放射肿瘤学家的验证证实了这些发现,50%相位获得最高评分。30%-70%相位的主观评分保持在4以上,而其余相位的评分低于4。结论:自由呼吸GRASP MRI不能独立代表所有呼吸相位的器官运动;它仅在中呼吸相位(30%-60%)准确表征运动,在50%相位表现最佳。当作为肝脏SBRT的勾画标准时,GRASP MRI应与4D-CT或动态成像模式结合,以确保全面的运动评估和准确的靶区定义。

英文摘要:

Objective: To determine whether free-breathing golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can represent respiratory-induced organ motion in patients with liver malignancies undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods: A retrospective analysis of 54 patients undergoing liver SBRT was conducted. Four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT), the gold standard for motion assessment, was used to characterize liver tumor motion. Image fusion was performed between free-breathing GRASP MRI and each respiratory phase of 4D-CT using an in-house registration program, with fusion quality quantified by maximum cross-correlation coefficient (MCC). Validation involved two blinded radiation oncologists: one repeated image fusion using the Eclipse-built-in module, while the other evaluated clinical relevance on a five-point scale. Results: The 50% respiratory phase of 4D-CT achieved the highest fusion quality with GRASP MRI, showing no significant differences compared to the 30% (P = 0.106), 40% (P = 0.632), and 60% (P = 0.792) phases. In contrast, fusion quality declined significantly beyond the mid-respiratory window (30%-60%), with poor fusion at the 0%, 10%, 20%, 80%, and 90% phases (P < 0.001). Validation by radiation oncologists corroborated these findings, with the 50% phase achieving the highest score. Subjective scores remained above 4 for phases 30%-70%, while scores for the remaining phases fell below 4. Conclusion: Free-breathing GRASP MRI cannot independently represent organ motion across all respiratory phases; it accurately characterizes motion only within the mid-respiratory phases (30%-60%), with optimal performance at the 50% phase. When used as a delineation standard in liver SBRT, GRASP MRI should be combined with 4D-CT or dynamic imaging modalities to ensure comprehensive motion assessment and accurate target volume definition.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑