arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.09792physics.geo-ph

机器学习地震目录性能的差异:意大利中部,2016-2017

Variability in Performance of a Machine-Learning Seismicity Catalog: Central Italy, 2016-2017

Jaehong Chung, Yifan Yu, Lauro Chiaraluce, Maddalena Michele, Gregory C. Beroza

AI总结:

研究通过对比机器学习和常规地震目录,发现ML方法在提高检测灵敏度的同时,也带来了空间上不均匀的性能差异。

摘要:

机器学习(ML)目录包含比常规目录更多的地震,但其在相位识别和地震检测方面的性能尚未得到充分评估。我们利用逻辑回归开发了站级检测概率,并将其结合到地震网络中,以计算空间完整性程度字段。我们将这种方法应用于两个目录,这两个目录均来自同一地震网络,一个为常规目录,另一个为基于机器学习的目录。在站级层面,ML识别器通过识别较小震级的事件并检测更远距离的地震提高了检测灵敏度。在空间上,完整性程度显著降低,中位值从P波的1.6降至0.5,从S波的1.7降至0.5。然而,ML目录在站级性能上的变化性也比常规目录更大。这些结果表明,基于ML的检测能力提升是广泛的,但空间上不均匀,突显了其优势、局限性以及进一步改进的潜力。

英文摘要:

Machine learning (ML) catalogs contain many more earthquakes than routine catalogs, but their performance in phase picking and earthquake detection has not been fully evaluated. We develop station-level detection probabilities using logistic regression and combine them across a seismic network to compute spatial magnitude-of-completeness fields. We apply this approach to two catalogs from the 2016-2017 Central Italy sequence that were constructed from the same seismic network, one routine and one ML based. At the station level, the ML picker increases detection sensitivity by identifying smaller magnitude events and detecting earthquakes at greater distances. Spatially, the magnitude-of-completeness decreases substantially, with median values shifting from 1.6 to 0.5 for P waves and from 1.7 to 0.5 for S waves. However, the ML catalog also shows greater variability in station-level performance than the routine catalog. These results demonstrate that ML-based improvements in detectability are widespread but spatially non-uniform, highlighting their benefits, their limitations, and the potential for further improvements.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑