arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2506.13964eess.IVcs.LG

用于筛查乳腺X线摄影中乳腺密度评估的ConvNeXt与视觉-语言模型的比较

Comparison of ConvNeXt and Vision-Language Models for Breast Density Assessment in Screening Mammography

School of Engineering and Sciences(工程与科学学院);School of Medical and Health Sciences(医学与健康科学学院)

Yusdivia Molina-Román, David Gómez-Ortiz, Ernestina Menasalvas-Ruiz, José Gerardo Tamez-Peña, Alejandro Santos-Díaz

AI总结:

针对乳腺X线密度分类的主观性难题,对比多模态模型BioMedCLIP与CNN模型ConvNeXt在三种学习场景下的表现,发现端到端微调的CNN模型性能更优,为医学影像分类模型选择和后续多模态优化提供参考。

摘要:

乳腺X线摄影的乳腺密度分类对癌症风险评估至关重要,但由于判读的主观性和观察者间的差异性,该任务仍具有挑战性。本研究对比了基于多模态和CNN的自动化BI-RADS系统分类方法,在三种学习场景下评估BioMedCLIP和ConvNeXt:零样本分类、结合文本描述的线性探测,以及使用数值标签的微调。结果显示,零样本分类性能一般,而微调后的ConvNeXt模型表现优于BioMedCLIP线性探测。尽管线性探测借助预训练嵌入展现出潜力,但效果不及全量微调。这些发现表明,尽管多模态学习前景可观,但采用端到端微调的CNN基模型在专科医学影像任务中表现更强。本研究强调,未来放射学应用需要更精细的文本表示和领域适配方案。

英文摘要:

Mammographic breast density classification is essential for cancer risk assessment but remains challenging due to subjective interpretation and inter-observer variability. This study compares multimodal and CNN-based methods for automated classification using the BI-RADS system, evaluating BioMedCLIP and ConvNeXt across three learning scenarios: zero-shot classification, linear probing with textual descriptions, and fine-tuning with numerical labels. Results show that zero-shot classification achieved modest performance, while the fine-tuned ConvNeXt model outperformed the BioMedCLIP linear probe. Although linear probing demonstrated potential with pretrained embeddings, it was less effective than full fine-tuning. These findings suggest that despite the promise of multimodal learning, CNN-based models with end-to-end fine-tuning provide stronger performance for specialized medical imaging. The study underscores the need for more detailed textual representations and domain-specific adaptations in future radiology applications.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑