arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2502.04487cond-mat.mtrl-sci
收藏

考虑强度的脆性断裂相场模型比较:I——混合模式加载

A comparison of phase field models of brittle fracture incorporating strength: I -- Mixed-mode loading

Umar Khayaz, Aarosh Dahal, Aditya Kumar

AI总结:

本文系统比较了三种考虑强度的脆性断裂相场模型在II型、III型及混合模式加载下的裂纹扩展预测能力,证实完全形核方法最可靠,并揭示了其他方法在强度面处理和断裂韧性预测上的不足。

摘要:

经典的脆性断裂变分相场模型能够有效预测大型预存裂纹的扩展,但裂纹形核的建模仍然是一个重大挑战。均匀应力下的裂纹形核取决于材料的强度面,而强度面的描述与基于能量的Griffith扩展准则在本质上是不相容的。为解决这一问题,目前出现了三种主要的相场方法,每种方法都试图协调材料强度与韧性。第一种被称为经典变分方法,它保留了变分结构,但无法准确纳入强度面。相比之下,另外两种方法——完全形核模型和混合内聚区模型——则牺牲了变分一致性。其中,只有完全形核方法能够精确考虑强度面。这三种方法,尤其是第二种,都偏离了脆性断裂的尖锐变分理论,这引发了对其在非I型加载条件下预测裂纹扩展可靠性的担忧。本文正是对这一问题的评估。这是比较这三种方法的系列研究中的第一篇,系统研究了II型、III型和混合模式加载下的裂纹扩展。结果证实,完全形核方法在所有研究问题中都能有效预测裂纹扩展,并且其预测结果在拉伸主导的情况下与其他两种方法吻合良好。此外,研究结果强调,经典变分方法中对强度面的不准确考虑会影响裂纹路径的预测。最后,结果揭示,在混合内聚区方法中修改裂纹驱动力以纳入强度面会导致裂纹在不正确的断裂韧性下扩展。

英文摘要:

The classical variational phase-field model for brittle fracture effectively predicts the growth of large pre-existing cracks. However, the modeling of crack nucleation continues to be a significant challenge. Crack nucleation under uniform stress depends on the material's strength surface whose description is fundamentally incompatible with the energy-based Griffith propagation criterion. To address this, three main phase-field approaches have emerged, each attempting to reconcile material strength and toughness. The first, known as the classical variational approach, preserves the variational structure but fails to accurately incorporate the strength surface. In contrast, the other two approaches -- the complete nucleation and hybrid cohesive zone models -- sacrifice variational consistency. Among these, only the complete nucleation approach precisely accounts for the strength surface. All three approaches, especially the second one, deviate from the sharp variational theory of brittle fracture, raising concerns about their reliability in predicting the growth of cracks under non-mode-I loading. This paper evaluates precisely this issue. It is the first in a series of studies comparing the three approaches, systematically investigating crack growth under mode II, mode III, and mixed-mode loadings. The results confirm that the complete nucleation approach effectively predicts crack growth across all investigated problems, and its predictions agree well with those from other two approaches for tension-dominated cases. Additionally, the findings highlight that inaccurate accounting of the strength surface in the classical variational approach can influence crack path predictions. Lastly, they reveal that modifying the crack driving force to incorporate the strength surface in the hybrid cohesive zone approach causes crack propagation at an incorrect fracture toughness.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑