arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2502.01751astro-ph.CO
收藏

成团统一暗区宇宙学:基于观测的背景演化与线性扰动

Clustered unified dark sector cosmology: Background evolution and linear perturbations in light of observations

Mahmoud Hashim, Amr El-Zant

AI总结:

本文研究可成团统一暗区模型的背景演化与线性扰动,发现成团比例 f 趋近 1 时模型趋近 ΛCDM,并利用 CMB 次级各向异性和晚期宇宙数据将 f 约束在约 0.97–0.99,同时允许较高的哈勃常数。

摘要:

我们考虑统一暗区模型,其中流体可以坍缩并成团形成暗晕,从而像标准宇宙学中一样进行等级式结构形成。我们证明,当成团比例 $f \rightarrow 1$ 时,背景演化和线性扰动都趋向于 $\Lambda$CDM 中的情形。我们将此类模型与多种观测数据集进行对比,重点放在动机相对充分的标准 Chaplygin 气体上。我们表明,最强的约束来自宇宙微波背景谱中的次级各向异性,这些数据偏好 $f \rightarrow 1$ 的模型。然而,由于较小的 $f$ 允许较大的哈勃常数,当纳入晚期宇宙膨胀数据时,$f \simeq 0.99$ 的值(而不是趋向于严格等于 1)更受青睐,并且在 2-$\sigma$ 水平上允许 $f \simeq 0.97$ 和 $H_0 \simeq 70 {\rm km/s/Mpc}$。这样的 $f$ 值意味着非线性结构中的成团效率极高。尽管如此,它们仍可能与基于温暗物质的宇宙学中的成团比例相容,后者具有与本文所考虑模型相似的最小暗晕质量尺度。宇宙微波背景对 $f$ 的严格约束也适用于广义 Chaplygin 气体,但已经相当接近 $\Lambda$CDM 的模型除外,在这种情况下 $0 \le f \le 1$ 的所有值都被允许。与宇宙微波背景相反,大尺度结构数据——最初被用来排除不成团的统一暗物质模型——的约束力要弱得多。事实上,包括大尺度星系分布在内的晚期宇宙数据偏好远离 $\Lambda$CDM 的模型,但这些模型与宇宙微波背景数据存在张力。

英文摘要:

We consider unified dark sector models in which the fluid can collapse and cluster into halos, allowing for hierarchical structure formation to proceed as in standard cosmology. We show that both background evolution and linear perturbations tend towards those in $\LCDM$ as the clustered fraction $f \rightarrow 1$. We confront such models with various observational datasets, with emphasis on the relatively well motivated standard Chaplygin gas. We show that the strongest constraints come from secondary anisotropies in the CMB spectrum, which prefer models with $f \rightarrow 1$. However, as a larger Hubble constant is allowed for smaller $f$, values of $f \simeq 0.99$ (rather than tending to exact unity) are favored when late universe expansion data is included, with $f \simeq 0.97$ and $H_0 \simeq 70 {\rm km/s/Mpc}$ allowed at the 2-$σ$ level. Such values of $f$ imply extremely efficient clustering into nonlinear structures. They may nevertheless be compatible with clustered fractions in warm dark matter based cosmologies, which have similar minimal halo mass scales as the models considered here. Tight CMB constraints on $f$ also apply to the generalized Chaplygin gas, except for models that are already quite close to $\LCDM$, in which case all values of $0 \le f \le 1$ are allowed. In contrast to the CMB, large scale structure data, which were initially used to rule out unclustered unified dark matter models, are far less constraining. Indeed, late universe data, including the large scale galaxy distribution, prefer models that are far from $\LCDM$. But these are in tension with the CMB data.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑