arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2412.20264cs.CL

使用大语言模型进行评分:一项关于对话中回应共情力测量的研究

Scoring with Large Language Models: A Study on Measuring Empathy of Responses in Dialogues

Westview High School(韦维尤高中);Portland State University(波特兰州立大学)

Henry J. Xie, Jinghan Zhang, Xinhao Zhang, Kunpeng Liu

AI总结:

本文研究大语言模型在对话共情力评分中的机制,提出用嵌入、MITI编码和LLM生成的显式子因素训练可解释分类器,发现其性能可接近微调LLM,为社会科学中的LLM评分应用提供新视角。

摘要:

近年来,大语言模型(LLMs)在完成复杂任务方面的能力日益强大。LLMs 常被用于的任务之一是评分,即从某一量表中为对象赋予一个数值。在本文中,我们力求理解 LLMs 如何进行评分,特别是在共情力评分的语境下。我们开发了一个新颖且全面的框架,用于研究 LLMs 在测量和评分对话中回应的共情力方面的有效性,以及可以采用哪些方法来加深我们对 LLM 评分的理解。我们的策略是用显式且可解释的特征来近似最先进 LLMs 和经过微调的 LLMs 的性能。我们使用对话的多种特征来训练分类器,这些特征包括嵌入、动机式访谈治疗完整性(MITI)编码、由 LLMs 提出的一组共情力显式子因素,以及 MITI 编码与显式子因素的组合。我们的结果表明,仅使用嵌入时,有可能达到接近通用 LLMs 的性能;而当利用由 LLM 评分的 MITI 编码和显式子因素时,训练出的分类器能够接近匹配经过微调的 LLMs 的性能。我们采用特征选择方法来推导共情力评分过程中最关键的若干特征。我们的工作为理解 LLM 共情力评分提供了新的视角,并有助于 LLM 社区探索 LLM 评分在社会科学研究中的潜力。

英文摘要:

In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have become increasingly more powerful in their ability to complete complex tasks. One such task in which LLMs are often employed is scoring, i.e., assigning a numerical value from a certain scale to a subject. In this paper, we strive to understand how LLMs score, specifically in the context of empathy scoring. We develop a novel and comprehensive framework for investigating how effective LLMs are at measuring and scoring empathy of responses in dialogues, and what methods can be employed to deepen our understanding of LLM scoring. Our strategy is to approximate the performance of state-of-the-art and fine-tuned LLMs with explicit and explainable features. We train classifiers using various features of dialogues including embeddings, the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) Code, a set of explicit subfactors of empathy as proposed by LLMs, and a combination of the MITI Code and the explicit subfactors. Our results show that when only using embeddings, it is possible to achieve performance close to that of generic LLMs, and when utilizing the MITI Code and explicit subfactors scored by an LLM, the trained classifiers can closely match the performance of fine-tuned LLMs. We employ feature selection methods to derive the most crucial features in the process of empathy scoring. Our work provides a new perspective toward understanding LLM empathy scoring and helps the LLM community explore the potential of LLM scoring in social science studies.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑