arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2601.10033cs.CL

EmplifAI:一个用于日语共情医疗对话的细粒度数据集,包含28种情绪标签

EmplifAI: a Fine-grained Dataset for Japanese Empathetic Medical Dialogues in 28 Emotion Labels

Kyoto Institute of Technology, Japan(京都技术大学);National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), Japan(信息通信技术国家研究所);Kyoto University, Japan(京都大学);Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Japan(奈良科学技术大学)

Wan Jou She, Lis Kanashiro Pereira, Fei Cheng, Sakiko Yahata, Panote Siriaraya, Eiji Aramaki

AI总结:

EmplifAI是一个用于日语共情医疗对话的细粒度数据集,包含28种情绪标签,通过微调提升了日本LLM的流畅性和共情能力。

摘要:

本文介绍了EmplifAI,一个日本共情对话数据集,旨在支持患有慢性医疗状况的患者。他们常常经历广泛的情绪(例如希望与绝望),这些情绪在疾病管理的不同阶段会变化。EmplifAI通过提供基于情境的对话,这些对话基于28种细粒度情绪类别,从GoEmotions分类法中改编和验证,来解决这种复杂性。该数据集包括280个医学情境和4125个两轮对话,通过众包和专家审查收集。为了评估共情对话中的情感匹配,我们使用BERTScore在多个大语言模型(LLMs)上评估模型预测情况,取得了F1得分为0.83。通过EmplifAI微调基础日本LLM(LLM-jp-3.1-13b-instruct4)实现了流畅性、一般共情和情绪特定共情的显著提升。此外,我们比较了由多个LLM生成的对话中LLM-as-a-Judge和人类评分者所赋予的分数,以验证我们的评估流程,并讨论了相关分析得出的见解和潜在风险。

英文摘要:

This paper introduces EmplifAI, a Japanese empathetic dialogue dataset designed to support patients coping with chronic medical conditions. They often experience a wide range of positive and negative emotions (e.g., hope and despair) that shift across different stages of disease management. EmplifAI addresses this complexity by providing situation-based dialogues grounded in 28 fine-grained emotion categories, adapted and validated from the GoEmotions taxonomy. The dataset includes 280 medically contextualized situations and 4125 two-turn dialogues, collected through crowdsourcing and expert review. To evaluate emotional alignment in empathetic dialogues, we assessed model predictions on situation--dialogue pairs using BERTScore across multiple large language models (LLMs), achieving F1 scores of 0.83. Fine-tuning a baseline Japanese LLM (LLM-jp-3.1-13b-instruct4) with EmplifAI resulted in notable improvements in fluency, general empathy, and emotion-specific empathy. Furthermore, we compared the scores assigned by LLM-as-a-Judge and human raters on dialogues generated by multiple LLMs to validate our evaluation pipeline and discuss the insights and potential risks derived from the correlation analysis.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑