arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2409.09220eess.SYcs.SY
收藏

批发电力市场中替代运行备用建模的市场影响

Market Implications of Alternative Operating Reserve Modeling in Wholesale Electricity Markets

Hamid Davoudi, Fengyu Wang, Yonghong Chen, Di Shi, Alinson Xavier, Feng Qiu

AI总结:

本文针对美国RTO辅助服务中的容量共享与备用替代,基于大规模合成电网数据比较四种备用约束建模,揭示建模差异对出清价格、备用数量和收益的显著影响。

摘要:

定价与结算机制对于高效资源配置、投资激励、市场竞争和监管监督至关重要。在美国,区域输电组织(RTO)采用统一价格机制,该机制依赖于供应额外电力的边际成本。本研究考察替代备用约束建模的定价与结算影响,强调即使约束建模中的细微变化,也可能显著改变市场出清价格、备用数量和收益结果。研究聚焦美国RTO在辅助服务方面的多样市场设计与假设,尤其是与容量共享和备用替代相关的内容,并基于大规模合成电力系统测试数据,检验了结合这些要素的四种不同模型。通过市场模拟和数据分析,本研究对这些替代备用约束的经济影响及潜在因素提供了关键洞见。

英文摘要:

Pricing and settlement mechanisms are crucial for efficient re-source allocation, investment incentives, market competition, and regulatory oversight. In the United States, Regional Transmission Operators (RTOs) adopts a uniform pricing scheme that hinges on the marginal costs of supplying additional electricity. This study investigates the pricing and settlement impacts of alternative reserve constraint modeling, highlighting how even slight variations in the modeling of constraints can drastically alter market clearing prices, reserve quantities, and revenue outcomes. Focusing on the diverse market designs and assumptions in ancillary services by U.S. RTOs, particularly in relation to capacity sharing and reserve substitutions, the research examines four distinct models that combine these elements based on a large-scale synthetic power system test data. Our study provides a critical insight into the economic implications and the underlying factors of these alternative reserve constraints through market simulations and data analysis.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑