arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2408.03023math.OC
收藏

可控性评分的唯一性分析及其在脑网络中的应用

Uniqueness Analysis of Controllability Scores and Their Application to Brain Networks

Kazuhiro Sato, Ryohei Kawamura

AI总结:

本文研究了线性时不变网络系统中VCS和AECS两种控制论中心性度量,证明了其在几乎所有终止时间下的唯一性及投影梯度法的线性收敛性,并在脑网络中揭示了二者在认知运动与感觉情感区域上的不同评估倾向。

摘要:

评估网络系统中的中心性对于理解节点重要性和指导决策过程至关重要。在动态网络中,纳入可控性视角对于识别关键节点是必不可少的。在本文中,我们研究了两种控制论中心性度量——体积可控性评分(VCS)和平均能量可控性评分(AECS)——以量化线性时不变网络系统中的节点重要性。我们证明了在几乎所有指定的终止时间下VCS和AECS的唯一性,从而将其适用性扩展到先前已知的情形之外。这确保了它们的可解释性、可比性和可重复性。我们的分析揭示了在具有对称和斜对称转移矩阵的线性系统中,VCS和AECS之间存在显著差异。我们还研究了VCS和AECS对终止时间的依赖性,并证明当该参数极小时,两个评分基本上变得均匀。此外,我们证明了用于计算VCS和AECS的投影梯度法生成的序列在几个假设下线性收敛于这两种度量。最后,在使用真实数据对通过Laplacian动力学建模的脑网络进行的评估中,揭示了VCS和AECS之间截然不同的评估趋势和相关性,其中AECS倾向于与认知和运动功能相关的大脑区域,而VCS则强调感觉和情感区域。

英文摘要:

Assessing centrality in network systems is critical for understanding node importance and guiding decision-making processes. In dynamic networks, incorporating a controllability perspective is essential for identifying key nodes. In this paper, we study two control theoretic centrality measures -- the Volumetric Controllability Score (VCS) and Average Energy Controllability Score (AECS) -- to quantify node importance in linear time-invariant network systems. We prove the uniqueness of VCS and AECS for almost all specified terminal times, thereby enhancing their applicability beyond previously recognized cases. This ensures their interpretability, comparability, and reproducibility. Our analysis reveals substantial differences between VCS and AECS in linear systems with symmetric and skew-symmetric transition matrices. We also investigate the dependence of VCS and AECS on the terminal time and prove that when this parameter is extremely small, both scores become essentially uniform. Additionally, we prove that a sequence generated by a projected gradient method for computing VCS and AECS converges linearly to both measures under several assumptions. Finally, evaluations on brain networks modeled via Laplacian dynamics using real data reveal contrasting evaluation tendencies and correlations for VCS and AECS, with AECS favoring brain regions associated with cognitive and motor functions, while VCS emphasizes sensory and emotional regions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑