arXiv 2408.024822024-08physics.soc-phcs.SI

物理学中合作与职业发展的性别差异

Gender differences in collaboration and career progression in physics

Mingrong She, Jan Bachmann, Fariba Karimi, Leto Peel

AI总结：

本研究通过逻辑回归和加速失效时间模型分析物理学合作网络，发现合作行为对职业发展的影响男女相似，但女性更倾向紧密大群体合作，且成为PI概率和职业生存率更低，需政策干预。

摘要：

我们考察了物理学中合作网络与学术职业发展方面的性别差异。我们使用成为主要研究者（PI）的可能性与时间以及作者职业生涯的长度来衡量职业发展。利用逻辑回归和加速失效时间模型，我们检验了合作行为的影响是否因性别而异。我们发现，在控制发表数量的情况下，合作行为与职业发展之间的关系在男性和女性中几乎相同。具体而言，我们发现，那些最终达到主要研究者（PI）地位的人，往往与更多独特的合作者发表过论文。相比之下，反复与高度互联的相同合作者发表论文，和/或每篇论文拥有更多共同作者，是职业生涯较短且未达到PI地位的特征。我们观察到，女性倾向于在联系更紧密且规模更大的群体中合作。最后，我们观察到，女性在整个职业生涯中达到PI地位的可能性较低，且生存概率低于男性，这呼吁制定政策以缩小这一关键差距。

英文摘要：

We examine gender differences in collaboration networks and academic career progression in physics. We use the likelihood and time to become a principal investigator (PI) and the length of an author's career to measure career progression. Utilising logistic regression and accelerated failure time models, we examine whether the effect of collaboration behaviour varies by gender. We find that, controlling for the number of publications, the relationship between collaborative behaviour and career progression is almost the same for men and women. Specifically, we find that those who eventually reach principal investigator (PI) status, tend to have published with more unique collaborators. In contrast, publishing repeatedly with the same highly interconnected collaborators and/or larger number of co-authors per publication is characteristic of shorter career lengths and not attaining PI status. We observe that women tend to collaborate in more tightly connected and larger groups than men. Finally, we observe that women are less likely to attain the status of PI throughout their careers and have a lower survival probability compared to men, which calls for policies to close this crucial gap.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。

AI总结：

摘要：

英文摘要：

相关论文