性别塑造科学领域生产力与期刊声望之间的关系
Gender shapes the relationship between productivity and journal prestige in science
AI总结：
研究探讨性别对科研生产力与期刊声望关系的影响，发现男性更倾向于生产力导向轨迹，而女性更重视期刊声望。尽管男性发表量更多，但女性在后期职业阶段和异常个体中表现更优。
摘要：
学术界中的性别差异在各种科学企业方面表现并持续存在，但其对研究生产力与期刊声望之间相互作用的影响仍不明确。本文分析了超过6000名巴西精英研究人员的学术轨迹，通过同时跟踪他们的年度生产力和发表期刊的平均声望。通过将个人职业年份投影到标准化的生产力-声望平面，并应用贝叶斯分层模型，发现男性研究人员更可能遵循生产力导向轨迹，并明显在该平面的超高产区域占多数。相比之下，女性研究人员更多占据优先考虑期刊声望而非发表数量的区域。尽管男性研究人员在其职业生涯中发表更多，但其女性同行在平均期刊声望方面达到可比或更高的水平，特别是在后期职业阶段和异常个体中。男性研究人员在生产力和影响水平上表现出更大的时间持续性，并且比女性同行更不倾向于同时改变这两个指标。在非异常个体中，生产力和职业年龄对研究人员的平均期刊声望有负影响，对女性研究人员的影响略强；然而，这些模式在不同学科间存在差异，突显了学术生涯的复杂性和异质性。
英文摘要：
Gender disparities in academia manifest and persist in various aspects of the scientific enterprise, yet their influence on the interplay between research productivity and journal prestige remains underexplored. Here we analyze the academic trajectories of over 6,000 elite Brazilian researchers by jointly tracking their annual productivity and the average prestige of the journals in which they publish. By projecting individual career years onto a standardized productivity-prestige plane and applying Bayesian hierarchical modeling, we find that male researchers are more likely to follow productivity-oriented trajectories and are markedly overrepresented in the hyperprolific region of this plane. Female peers, in contrast, more often occupy regions that prioritize journal prestige over publication quantity. Although male researchers publish more throughout their careers, their female counterparts achieve comparable or higher average journal prestige, particularly in later career stages and among outlier individuals. Male researchers also exhibit greater temporal persistence in their productivity and impact levels and are especially averse to simultaneously changing both metrics compared to their female peers. Among non-outliers, productivity and career age have a negative overall impact on the average journal prestige of researchers of both genders, with slightly stronger effects observed among female researchers; however, these patterns vary across disciplines, highlighting the complexity and heterogeneity of academic careers.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
