arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2405.13596astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
收藏

SN 2023zaw:超剥离恒星的低能爆炸

SN 2023zaw: the low-energy explosion of an ultra-stripped star

T. Moore, J. H. Gillanders, M. Nicholl, M. E. Huber, S. J. Smartt, S. Srivastav, H. F. Stevance, T. -W. Chen, K. C. Chambers, J. P. Anderson, M. D. Fulton, S. R… 展开作者

T. Moore, J. H. Gillanders, M. Nicholl, M. E. Huber, S. J. Smartt, S. Srivastav, H. F. Stevance, T. -W. Chen, K. C. Chambers, J. P. Anderson, M. D. Fulton, S. R. Oates, C. Angus, G. Pignata, N. Erasmus, H. Gao, J. Herman, C. -C. Lin, T. Lowe, E. A. Magnier, P. Minguez, C. -C. Ngeow, X. Sheng, S. A. Sim, K. W. Smith, R. Wainscoat, S. Yang, D. R. Young, K. -J. Zeng

AI总结:

本文报道SN 2023zaw,一颗低抛射物质量的快速演化超新星,通过光谱和多波段测光观测,结合贝叶斯分析,提出其能量来源除镍外还需额外加热,如中心引擎或星周物质相互作用。

摘要:

大多数剥离包层超新星的前身星被认为是通过双星相互作用形成的,从其外层失去氢和/或氦。超剥离超新星是一类新兴的瞬变天体,预计是通过中子星伴星的包层剥离产生的。然而,目前已知的例子相对较少,此类系统的结果可能多种多样,且目前对其了解甚少。在此,我们介绍了SN 2023zaw的光谱观测和高频多波段测光,这是一颗快速演化的超新星,具有低抛射物质量,发现于距离D = 39.7 Mpc的邻近旋涡星系中。它存在显著的银河系消光,$E(B-V)_{\rm MW} = 0.21$,以及显著(但不确定)的宿主星系消光。贝叶斯证据比较表明,镍不是唯一的能量来源,需要额外的能量来源来解释我们的观测。我们的模型表明,需要抛射物质量$M_{\rm ej} \sim 0.07$ $\rm M_{\odot}$和合成的镍质量$M_{\rm Ni} \sim 0.007$ $\rm M_{\odot}$来解释观测结果。我们发现,来自中心引擎的额外加热,或与星周物质的相互作用,可以为早期光变曲线提供能量。

英文摘要:

Most stripped-envelope supernova progenitors are thought to be formed through binary interaction, losing hydrogen and/or helium from their outer layers. Ultra-stripped supernovae are an emerging class of transient which are expected to be produced through envelope-stripping by a NS companion. However, relatively few examples are known and the outcomes of such systems can be diverse and are poorly understood at present. Here, we present spectroscopic observations and high-cadence, multi-band photometry of SN 2023zaw, a rapidly evolving supernova with a low ejecta mass discovered in a nearby spiral galaxy at D = 39.7 Mpc. It has significant Milky Way extinction, $E(B-V)_{\rm MW} = 0.21$, and significant (but uncertain) host extinction. Bayesian evidence comparison reveals that nickel is not the only power source and an additional energy source is required to explain our observations. Our models suggest an ejecta mass of $M_{\rm ej} \sim 0.07$ $\rm M_{\odot}$ and a synthesized nickel mass of $M_{\rm Ni} \sim 0.007$ $\rm M_{\odot}$ are required to explain the observations. We find that additional heating from a central engine, or interaction with circumstellar material can power the early light curve.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑