arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2403.01436gr-qchep-th
收藏

三维爱因斯坦-麦克斯韦系统的热力学

Thermodynamics of the 3-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell system

Shoichiro Miyashita

AI总结:

该研究采用零圈鞍点近似分析三维爱因斯坦-麦克斯韦系统的热力学性质,发现Λ<0时系统热力学表现良好,Λ=0时三维系统热力学不稳定,与四维情形存在关键差异,为理解三维引力热力学提供两种可能方向。

摘要:

近期,笔者研究了带盒子边界的四维爱因斯坦-麦克斯韦系统的热力学性质[1](JHEP 04 (2024) 083)。本文中,笔者采用零圈鞍点近似,且如常仅聚焦于简单拓扑扇区,对三维情形下的该系统热力学性质展开研究。与四维情形类似,当$\Lambda<0$时,系统热力学表现良好(这源于“金袋”鞍点的贡献)。但当$\Lambda=0$时,三维系统与四维系统出现关键差异:三维系统被证明热力学不稳定,而四维系统则是热力学稳定的。这为我们理解$\Lambda=0$的三维引力的热力学特性提供了两种可能:其一,零圈近似或仅限制于简单拓扑扇区,对于$\Lambda=0$的三维情形而言并不充分;其二,$\Lambda=0$时三维引力本身确实具有热力学不稳定性。

英文摘要:

Recently, I studied the thermodynamical properties of the Einstein-Maxwell system with a box boundary in 4-dimensions [1](JHEP 04 (2024) 083). In this paper, I investigate those in 3-dimensions using the zero-loop saddle-point approximation and focusing only on a simple topology sector as usual. Similar to the 4-dimensional case, the system is thermodynamically well-behaved when $Λ<0$ (due to the contribution of the "bag of gold" saddles). However, when $Λ=0$, a crucial difference to the 4-dimensional case appears, i.e. the 3-dimensional system turns out to be thermodynamically unstable, while the 4-dimensional one is thermodynamically stable. This may offer two options for how we think about the thermodynamics of 3-dimensional gravity with $Λ=0$. One is that the zero-loop approximation or restricting the simple topology sector is not sufficient for 3-dimensions with $Λ=0$. The other is that 3-dimensional gravity is really thermodynamically unstable when $Λ=0$.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑