Motivated by recent work in computational social choice, we extend the metric distortion framework to clustering problems. Given a set of $n$ agents located in an underlying metric space, our goal is to partition them into $k$ clusters, optimizing some social cost objective. The metric space is defined by a distance function $d$ between the agent locations. Information about $d$ is available only implicitly via $n$ rankings, through which each agent ranks all other agents in terms of their distance from her. Still, we would like to evaluate clustering algorithms in terms of social cost objectives that are defined using $d$. This is done using the notion of distortion, which measures how far from optimality a clustering can be, taking into account all underlying metrics that are consistent with the ordinal information available. Unfortunately, the most important clustering objectives do not admit algorithms with finite distortion. To sidestep this disappointing fact, we follow two alternative approaches: We first explore whether resource augmentation can be beneficial. We consider algorithms that use more than $k$ clusters but compare their social cost to that of the optimal $k$-clusterings. We show that using exponentially (in terms of $k$) many clusters, we can get low (constant or logarithmic) distortion for the $k$-center and $k$-median objectives. Interestingly, such an exponential blowup is shown to be necessary. More importantly, we explore whether limited cardinal information can be used to obtain better results. Somewhat surprisingly, for $k$-median and $k$-center, we show that a number of queries that is polynomial in $k$ and only logarithmic in $n$ (i.e., only sublinear in the number of agents for the most relevant scenarios in practice) is enough to get constant distortion.
Sensitivity and Differential Privacy in Metric Voting with Distortion below Three
CyberAgent, Tokyo, Japan（CyberAgent）；National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan（国立情报学研究所）；Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, RIKEN, Tokyo, Japan（理化学研究所先进智能研究中心）；Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan（京都大学）
Harvard University（哈佛大学）；The Hebrew University Business School and the Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem（耶路撒冷希伯来大学商学院与费德曼理性研究中心）
