Multi-winner voting plays a crucial role in selecting representative committees based on voter preferences. Previous research has predominantly focused on single-stage voting rules, which are susceptible to manipulation during preference collection. In order to mitigate manipulation and increase the cost associated with it, we propose the introduction of multiple stages in the voting procedure, leading to the development of a unified framework of multi-stage multi-winner voting rules. To shed light on this framework of voting methods, we conduct an axiomatic study, establishing provable conditions for achieving desired axioms within our model. Our theoretical findings can serve as a guide for the selection of appropriate multi-stage multi-winner voting rules.
We consider the distributed single-winner metric voting problem on a line, where agents and alternative are represented by points on the line of real numbers, the agents are partitioned into disjoint districts, and the goal is to choose a single winning alternative in a decentralized manner. In particular, the choice is done by a distributed voting mechanism which first selects a representative alternative for each district of agents and then chooses one of these representatives as the winner. In this paper, we design simple distributed mechanisms that achieve distortion at most $2+\sqrt{5}$ f…
Multi-winner voting is the process of selecting a fixed-size set of representative candidates based on voters' preferences. It occurs in applications ranging from politics (parliamentary elections) to the design of modern computer applications (collaborative filtering, dynamic Q&A platforms, diversifying search results). All these applications share the problem of identifying a representative subset of alternatives -- and the study of multi-winner voting is the principled analysis of this task. This book provides a thorough and in-depth look at multi-winner voting based on approval preferences…
Perpetual voting was recently introduced as a framework for long-term collective decision making. In this framework, we consider a sequence of subsequent approval-based elections and try to achieve a fair overall outcome. To achieve fairness over time, perpetual voting rules take the history of previous decisions into account and identify voters that were dissatisfied with previous decisions. In this paper, we look at perpetual voting rules from an axiomatic perspective and study two main questions. First, we ask how simple such rules can be while still meeting basic desiderata. For two simple…
Epistemic voting interprets votes as noisy signals about a ground truth. We consider contexts where the truth consists of a set of objective winners, knowing a lower and upper bound on its cardinality. A prototypical problem for this setting is the aggre-gation of multi-label annotations with prior knowledge on the size of the ground truth. We posit noisemodels, for which we define rules that output an optimal set of winners. We report on experiments on multi-label annotations (which we collected).
Proportional Approval Method using Squared loads, Approval removal and Coin-flip approval transformation (PAMSAC) - a new system of proportional representation using approval voting
Tulane University（杜兰大学）；Louisiana State University（路易斯安那州立大学）；University of West Florida（西佛罗里达大学）；Institute for Human and Machine Cognition（人机认知研究所）
In many real world situations, collective decisions are made using voting and, in scenarios such as committee or board elections, employing voting rules that return multiple winners. In multi-winner approval voting (AV), an agent submits a ballot consisting of approvals for as many candidates as they wish, and winners are chosen by tallying up the votes and choosing the top-$k$ candidates receiving the most approvals. In many scenarios, an agent may manipulate the ballot they submit in order to achieve a better outcome by voting in a way that does not reflect their true preferences. In complex…
The winner determination problems of many attractive multi-winner voting rules are NP-complete. However, they often admit polynomial-time algorithms when restricting inputs to be single-peaked. Commonly, such algorithms employ dynamic programming along the underlying axis. We introduce a new technique: carefully chosen integer linear programming (IP) formulations for certain voting problems admit an LP relaxation which is totally unimodular if preferences are single-peaked, and which thus admits an integral optimal solution. This technique gives efficient algorithms for finding optimal committ…
Beyond Lower Quota: Avoiding Overrepresentation in Multi-Winner Voting
University of Warwick（华威大学）；University of Applied Sciences St. Pölten（圣珀尔滕应用科技大学）；WU Vienna University of Economics and Business（维也纳经济与商业大学）；TU Wien（维也纳工业大学）；Shanghai University of Finance and Economics（上海财经大学）
How long is a piece of string? An exploration of multi-winner approval voting and ballot-length restrictions
从学术团体和协会到公共选举，在各种场合都可以看到多赢家批准选举。在这类选举中，往往实行选票长度限制;也就是说，选民对他们可以投票选举的候选人人数有限制。尽管有这一共同特征，但选票长度限制似乎没有任何理论依据（Laslier和Van der Straeten，2016）。这项工作内生地得出了一套选民最佳反应选票长度在完全信息和选民效用和投票规则的一般假设。这些结果为实践中观察到的一些选票长度限制提供了理由，但是当考虑均衡结果时，我们的分析表明这种理由不再有效。均衡分析被认为是懒惰和真理偏见的二阶倾向的选民和均衡解决方案的概念是纯粹的纳什均衡。关键的见解表明，选票长度的限制或制度的特点，使投票成本可能会导致不稳定的选举结果时，选民有不同的偏好，通过不存在的均衡。另一方面，当均衡确实存在时，它们满足理想的性质，而这些性质是在无成本投票和没有投票长度限制的情况下获得的均衡所不能保证的。总之，我们的研究结果突出了稳定和理想的选举结果之间的鲜明权衡。
We consider a setting with agents that have preferences over alternatives and are partitioned into disjoint districts. The goal is to choose one alternative as the winner using a mechanism which first decides a representative alternative for each district based on a local election with the agents therein as participants, and then chooses one of the district representatives as the winner. Previous work showed bounds on the distortion of a specific class of deterministic plurality-based mechanisms depending on the available information about the preferences of the agents in the districts. In thi…
Recent work in iterative voting has defined the additive dynamic price of anarchy (ADPoA) as the difference in social welfare between the truthful and worst-case equilibrium profiles resulting from repeated strategic manipulations. While iterative plurality has been shown to only return alternatives with at most one less initial votes than the truthful winner, it is less understood how agents' welfare changes in equilibrium. To this end, we differentiate agents' utility from their manipulation mechanism and determine iterative plurality's ADPoA in the worst- and average-cases. We first prove t…
Participatory budgeting (PB) is a democratic paradigm whereby voters decide on a set of projects to fund with a limited budget. We consider PB in a setting where voters report ordinal preferences over projects and have (possibly) asymmetric weights. We propose proportional representation axioms and clarify how they fit into other preference aggregation settings, such as multi-winner voting and approval-based multi-winner voting. As a result of our study, we also discover a new solution concept for approval-based multi-winner voting, which we call Inclusion PSC (IPSC). IPSC is stronger than pro…
We propose a new single-winner voting system using ranked ballots: Stable Voting. The motivating principle of Stable Voting is that if a candidate A would win without another candidate B in the election, and A beats B in a head-to-head majority comparison, then A should still win in the election with B included (unless there is another candidate A' who has the same kind of claim to winning, in which case a tiebreaker may choose between such candidates). We call this principle Stability for Winners (with Tiebreaking). Stable Voting satisfies this principle while also having a remarkable ability…
The computational complexity of winner determination is a classical and important problem in computational social choice. Previous work based on worst-case analysis has established NP-hardness of winner determination for some classic voting rules, such as Kemeny, Dodgson, and Young. In this paper, we revisit the classical problem of winner determination through the lens of semi-random analysis, which is a worst average-case analysis where the preferences are generated from a distribution chosen by the adversary. Under a natural class of semi-random models that are inspired by recommender syste…
