arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2304.05077cs.AI
收藏

如果意识具有动态相关性,人工智能便不具有意识

If consciousness is dynamically relevant, artificial intelligence isn't conscious

Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy, LMU Munich(慕尼黑大学慕尼黑数学哲学中心);Munich Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences, LMU Munich(慕尼黑大学慕尼黑系统神经科学研究生院);Institute for Psychology, University of Bamberg(班贝格大学心理学研究所);Institute for Theoretical Physics, Utrecht University(乌得勒支大学理论物理研究所)

Johannes Kleiner, Tim Ludwig

AI总结:

本文论证若意识对系统状态演化具有动态相关性,则因AI处理器设计验证排除偏差,AI系统不可能具有意识。

摘要:

我们证明,如果意识对系统状态的时间演化具有相关性——即具有动态相关性——那么人工智能系统便不能具有意识。这是因为人工智能系统运行于CPU、GPU、TPU或其他处理器上,这些处理器经过设计和验证,以确保其计算动力学系统地排除或抑制偏差。这种设计和验证尤其排除或抑制了潜在的与意识相关的动力学效应,因此,如果意识具有动态相关性,人工智能系统便不能具有意识。

英文摘要:

We demonstrate that if consciousness is relevant for the temporal evolution of a system's states--that is, if it is dynamically relevant--then AI systems cannot be conscious. That is because AI systems run on CPUs, GPUs, TPUs or other processors which have been designed and verified to adhere to computational dynamics that systematically preclude or suppress deviations. The design and verification preclude or suppress, in particular, potential consciousness-related dynamical effects, so that if consciousness is dynamically relevant, AI systems cannot be conscious.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑