arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2302.09604cs.DScs.CC
收藏

参数化最大最小反馈顶点集

Parameterized Max Min Feedback Vertex Set

Michael Lampis, Nikolaos Melissinos, Manolis Vasilakis

AI总结:

本文研究参数化Max Min FVS问题,提出基于树宽的DP算法并推广已有顶点覆盖相关算法,证明两类算法的最优性,同时纠正已有FPT分支算法的错误,给出复杂度更优的分支算法。

摘要:

给定图$G$和整数$k$,Max Min FVS(最大最小反馈顶点集)问题旨在判断是否存在一个大小至少为$k$的极小顶点集,删除该顶点集可破坏图中所有环。本文针对该问题参数化复杂度的结构参数与自然参数两类维度,提出多项改进现有最优结果的结论。\n 首先,本文采用标准动态规划(DP)技术,提出了时间复杂度为$\textrm{tw}^{O(\textrm{tw})}n^{O(1)}$的算法,其中$\textrm{tw}$、$\textrm{vc}$分别表示输入图的树宽和顶点覆盖数,该算法大幅推广了Gaikwad等人近期提出的时间复杂度为$\textrm{vc}^{O(\textrm{vc})}n^{O(1)}$的算法。随后本文证明,上述两种算法在本质上已是最优,因为若存在$\textrm{vc}^{o(\textrm{vc})}n^{O(1)}$的算法,将推翻指数时间假设(ETH)。\n 针对自然参数$k$,Gaikwad等人近期的工作声称提出了复杂度为$10^k n^{O(1)}$的固定参数可解(FPT)分支算法。本文指出该算法存在错误,并提出了一种复杂度为$9.34^k n^{O(1)}$的分支算法。

英文摘要:

Given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, Max Min FVS asks whether there exists a minimal set of vertices of size at least $k$ whose deletion destroys all cycles. We present several results that improve upon the state of the art of the parameterized complexity of this problem with respect to both structural and natural parameters. Using standard DP techniques, we first present an algorithm of time $\textrm{tw}^{O(\textrm{tw})}n^{O(1)}$, significantly generalizing a recent algorithm of Gaikwad et al. of time $\textrm{vc}^{O(\textrm{vc})}n^{O(1)}$, where $\textrm{tw}, \textrm{vc}$ denote the input graph's treewidth and vertex cover respectively. Subsequently, we show that both of these algorithms are essentially optimal, since a $\textrm{vc}^{o(\textrm{vc})}n^{O(1)}$ algorithm would refute the ETH. With respect to the natural parameter $k$, the aforementioned recent work by Gaikwad et al. claimed an FPT branching algorithm with complexity $10^k n^{O(1)}$. We point out that this algorithm is incorrect and present a branching algorithm of complexity $9.34^k n^{O(1)}$.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑