arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2302.01031eess.IV

用于多序列MRI转换的局部隐式神经表示

Local Implicit Neural Representations for Multi-Sequence MRI Translation

Yunjie Chen, Marius Staring, Jelmer M. Wolterink, Qian Tao

AI总结:

提出基于局部隐式神经表示的MRI转换方法,利用超网络生成的局部MLP恢复缺失序列的细节,在BraTS数据集上优于经典pix2pix模型。

摘要:

在放射学实践中,常规获取多序列MRI以表征解剖结构和组织。然而,由于成像协议的异质性和对造影剂的禁忌症,某些MRI序列(例如对比增强T1加权图像(T1ce))可能无法获取。这给汇总异构数据集的大规模临床研究带来了困难。现代深度学习技术已展现出通过从广泛的多序列MRI数据集中学习来从现有序列合成缺失序列的能力。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于局部隐式神经表示的新型MR图像转换解决方案。我们将可用的MRI序列分割为局部图像块,并为每个图像块分配一个局部多层感知机(MLP),以表示T1ce中的图像块。这些局部MLP的参数由基于图像特征的超网络生成。在BraTS挑战赛数据集上的实验结果和消融研究表明,局部MLP对于恢复精细的图像和肿瘤细节至关重要,因为它们允许局部特化,这对于准确的图像转换非常重要。与经典的pix2pix模型相比,所提出的方法展示了视觉改善和显著提高的定量分数(MSE 0.86 x 10^-3 vs. 1.02 x 10^-3,SSIM 94.9 vs 94.3)。

英文摘要:

In radiological practice, multi-sequence MRI is routinely acquired to characterize anatomy and tissue. However, due to the heterogeneity of imaging protocols and contra-indications to contrast agents, some MRI sequences, e.g. contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image (T1ce), may not be acquired. This creates difficulties for large-scale clinical studies for which heterogeneous datasets are aggregated. Modern deep learning techniques have demonstrated the capability of synthesizing missing sequences from existing sequences, through learning from an extensive multi-sequence MRI dataset. In this paper, we propose a novel MR image translation solution based on local implicit neural representations. We split the available MRI sequences into local patches and assign to each patch a local multi-layer perceptron (MLP) that represents a patch in the T1ce. The parameters of these local MLPs are generated by a hypernetwork based on image features. Experimental results and ablation studies on the BraTS challenge dataset showed that the local MLPs are critical for recovering fine image and tumor details, as they allow for local specialization that is highly important for accurate image translation. Compared to a classical pix2pix model, the proposed method demonstrated visual improvement and significantly improved quantitative scores (MSE 0.86 x 10^-3 vs. 1.02 x 10^-3 and SSIM 94.9 vs 94.3)

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑