arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2211.03048physics.chem-phcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-elnucl-th
收藏

激发态的状态特定组态相互作用

State-Specific Configuration Interaction for Excited States

Fábris Kossoski, Pierre-François Loos

AI总结:

本文提出状态特定组态相互作用($\Delta$CI)方法,通过针对每个激发态优化轨道和行列式,结合微扰或Davidson修正,在294个参考激发能上优于标准CI,媲美EOM-CC,适用于多参考和开壳层体系,但限于低激发态。

摘要:

我们引入并基准测试了一种系统可改进的激发态计算路线,即状态特定组态相互作用($\Delta$CI),它是多组态自洽场和多参考组态相互作用的一种特定实现。从由优化的组态态函数构建的参考态出发,对每个目标态分别进行CI计算(因此具有状态特定的轨道和行列式)。考虑单激发和双激发产生$\Delta$CISD模型,该模型可通过二阶Epstein-Nesbet微扰理论($\Delta$CISD+EN2)或后验Davidson修正($\Delta$CISD+Q)进行改进。这些模型针对294个参考激发能的广泛且多样的数据集进行了评估。我们发现$\Delta$CI比标准的基于基态的自洽场CI显著更准确,而$\Delta$CISD与EOM-CC2之间以及$\Delta$CISD+EN2与EOM-CCSD之间的性能相近。对于较大体系,$\Delta$CISD+Q比EOM-CC2和EOM-CCSD提供更准确的结果。$\Delta$CI路线可以处理具有挑战性的多参考问题、单激发和双激发态,涵盖闭壳层和开壳层物种,总体精度相当,因此代表了相对于更成熟方法的一种有前途的替代方案。然而,在其当前形式下,它仅对相对低激发态可靠。

英文摘要:

We introduce and benchmark a systematically improvable route for excited-state calculations, state-specific configuration interaction ($Δ$CI), \alert{which is a particular realization of multiconfigurational self-consistent field and multireference configuration interaction.} Starting with a reference built from optimized configuration state functions, separate CI calculations are performed for each targeted state (hence state-specific orbitals and determinants). Accounting for single and double excitations produces the $Δ$CISD model, which can be improved with second-order Epstein-Nesbet perturbation theory ($Δ$CISD+EN2) or a posteriori Davidson corrections ($Δ$CISD+Q). These models were gauged against a vast and diverse set of 294 reference excitation energies. We have found that $Δ$CI is significantly more accurate than standard ground-state-based CI, whereas close performances were found between $Δ$CISD and EOM-CC2, and between $Δ$CISD+EN2 and EOM-CCSD. For larger systems, $Δ$CISD+Q delivers more accurate results than EOM-CC2 and EOM-CCSD. The $Δ$CI route can handle challenging multireference problems, singly- and doubly-excited states, from closed- and open-shell species, with overall comparable accuracy, and thus represents a promising alternative to more established methodologies. In its current form, however, it is only reliable for relatively low-lying excited states.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑