arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2107.06331cs.GTcs.SYeess.SY

最小化拥堵博弈中无政府代价的非预期后果

The Unintended Consequences of Minimizing the Price of Anarchy in Congestion Games

Rahul Chandan, Dario Paccagnan, Jason R. Marden

AI总结:

本文研究原子拥堵博弈中税收设计对无政府代价与稳定代价的影响,发现优化PoA的税收规则会导致PoS与PoA相匹配,揭示了二者之间的根本性权衡,并刻画了其帕累托前沿。

摘要:

本文聚焦于原子拥堵博弈中的税收设计,该博弈是竞争性资源共享中一种被广泛研究的模型。虽然大多数相关研究侧重于优化最坏情形或最好情形下的性能(即无政府代价(PoA)或稳定代价(PoS)),但我们探究了针对PoA的优化是否会对PoS产生影响。或许令人惊讶的是,我们的结果揭示了这两个性能指标之间存在一种根本性的权衡。我们的主要结果表明,优化PoA的税收规则继承了与之相匹配的PoS,这意味着在这种设计选择下,最好结果并不比最坏结果更好。随后,我们从PoA与PoS之间的帕累托前沿角度研究了这一权衡。我们的结果还证明,任何PoS等于1的税收都会导致显著更高的PoA,并且在若干被充分研究的案例中,未征税设置严格位于帕累托前沿之上。

英文摘要:

This work focuses on the design of taxes in atomic congestion games, a commonly studied model for competitive resource sharing. While most related studies focus on optimizing either the worst- or best-case performance (i.e., Price of Anarchy (PoA) or Price of Stability (PoS)), we investigate whether optimizing for the PoA has consequences on the PoS. Perhaps surprisingly, our results reveal a fundamental trade-off between the two performance metrics. Our main result demonstrates that the taxation rule that optimizes the PoA inherits a matching PoS, implying that the best outcome is no better than the worst outcome under such a design choice. We then study this trade-off in terms of the Pareto frontier between the PoA and PoS. Our results also establish that any taxes with PoS equal to 1 incur a much higher PoA, and that, in several well-studied cases, the untaxed setting lies strictly above the Pareto frontier.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑