arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2010.02400math.NAcs.NAeess.IVphysics.med-ph
收藏

均匀三次B样条位移场的解析正则化广义框架

A Generalized Framework for Analytic Regularization of Uniform Cubic B-spline Displacement Fields

Keyur D. Shah, James A. Shackleford, Nagarajan Kandasamy, Gregory C. Sharp

AI总结:

本文提出了一个支持五种正则化器的均匀三次B样条位移场解析正则化广义框架,在保证精度的同时,计算速度比数值方法快达两个数量级。

摘要:

图像配准是一个本质上不适定的问题,缺乏在被配准的两幅图像的体素之间实现唯一映射所需的约束。因此,必须对配准进行正则化以获得物理上有意义的变换。正则化惩罚项通常是位移矢量场导数的函数,可以通过解析或数值方法计算。然而,数值方法在计算上代价高昂且取决于图像大小,因此开发了一种计算高效的解析框架。使用三次B样条作为配准变换,我们开发了一个广义数学框架,支持五种不同的正则化器:扩散、曲率、线性弹性、三阶和总位移。我们通过在精度方面将每种正则化器与其数值对应方法进行比较来验证我们的方法。我们还提供了基准测试结果,表明解析解的运行速度显著快于基于有限差分的数值实现——最高可达两个数量级。

英文摘要:

Image registration is an inherently ill-posed problem that lacks the constraints needed for a unique mapping between voxels of the two images being registered. As such, one must regularize the registration to achieve physically meaningful transforms. The regularization penalty is usually a function of derivatives of the displacement-vector field, and can be calculated either analytically or numerically. The numerical approach, however, is computationally expensive depending on the image size, and therefore a computationally efficient analytical framework has been developed. Using cubic B-splines as the registration transform, we develop a generalized mathematical framework that supports five distinct regularizers: diffusion, curvature, linear elastic, third-order, and total displacement. We validate our approach by comparing each with its numerical counterpart in terms of accuracy. We also provide benchmarking results showing that the analytic solutions run significantly faster -- up to two orders of magnitude -- than finite differencing based numerical implementations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑