arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2009.05069quant-ph
收藏

自适应Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt博弈中量子理论关联自检验的探索

Towards correlation self-testing of quantum theory in the adaptive Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt game

Mirjam Weilenmann, Roger Colbeck

AI总结:

本文研究自适应CHSH博弈在不同广义概率论中的最大获胜概率,证明多种张量积结构下均无法超越或恢复量子理论的表现,为通过实验排除非量子关联理论奠定基础。

摘要:

理论的关联自检验旨在回答这样一个问题:我们能否根据某一理论在特定信息处理任务中的表现来识别该理论中可实现的关联集合。应用于量子理论时,其目标是找到一个信息处理任务,使得在任何因果结构下,只有实现与量子理论相同关联集合的理论才能达到最优表现。在[Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 060406 (2020)]中,我们为此引入了一个候选任务,即自适应CHSH博弈。本文分析了该博弈在不同广义概率论中的最大获胜概率。我们证明,具有由最小张量积或最大张量积给出的联合状态空间的理论劣于量子理论,随后考虑了基本系统具有各种二维状态空间的理论中的其他张量积。对于这些理论,我们未发现在自适应CHSH博弈中优于量子理论的理论,并证明了在多种情形下不可能恢复量子表现。这是迈向一般解的第一步,若成功,将产生广泛深远的后果,尤其是使得一项实验能够排除所有可实现关联集合与量子集合不一致的理论。

英文摘要:

Correlation self-testing of a theory addresses the question of whether we can identify the set of correlations realisable in a theory from its performance in a particular information processing task. Applied to quantum theory it aims to identify an information processing task whose optimal performance is achieved only by theories realising the same correlations as quantum theory in any causal structure. In [Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 060406 (2020)] we introduced a candidate task for this, the adaptive CHSH game. Here, we analyse the maximum probability of winning this game in different generalised probabilistic theories. We show that theories with a joint state space given by the minimal or the maximal tensor product are inferior to quantum theory, before considering other tensor products in theories whose elementary systems have various two-dimensional state spaces. For these, we find no theories that outperform quantum theory in the adaptive CHSH game and prove that it is impossible to recover the quantum performance in various cases. This is the first step towards a general solution that, if successful, will have wide-ranging consequences, in particular, enabling an experiment that could rule out all theories in which the set of realisable correlations does not coincide with the quantum set.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑