arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2008.10485physics.plasm-phphysics.app-ph
收藏

稳态与脉冲托卡马克堆

Steady State versus Pulsed Tokamak Reactors

Daniel J. Segal, Antoine J. Cerfon, Jeffrey P. Freidberg

摘要:

我们已经进行了详细的分析,比较稳态与脉冲托卡马克反应堆。动机如下。稳态电流驱动比预期的更困难-驱动安培需要太多的瓦特,这对功率平衡和经济性有负面影响。高温REBCO超导体的最新发展部分地补偿了这一点,高温REBCO超导体提供了更紧凑、更低成本的稳态和脉冲托卡马克反应堆的希望。重新感兴趣的是减少脉冲反应堆的尺寸,因为对于给定的所需脉冲尺寸,更高的场OH Transformers的可能性。我们的主要结论是,脉冲反应堆可能确实具有竞争力的稳态反应堆,这个问题应该重新审视更详细的工程水平的研究。

英文摘要:

We have carried out a detailed analysis that compares steady state versus pulsed tokamak reactors. The motivations are as follows. Steady state current drive has turned out to be more difficult than expected - it takes too many watts to drive an Ampere, which has a negative effect on power balance and economics. This is partially compensated by the recent development of high temperature REBCO superconductors, which offers the promise of more compact, lower cost tokamak reactors, both steady state and pulsed. Of renewed interest is the reduction in size of pulsed reactors because of the possibility of higher field OH transformers for a given required pulse size. Our main conclusion is that pulsed reactors may indeed be competitive with steady state reactors and this issue should be re-examined with more detailed engineering level studies.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑