arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2007.00831physics.chem-ph
收藏

具有激发态平均场和微扰理论的核激发

Core Excitations with Excited State Mean Field and Perturbation Theory

Scott M. Garner, Eric Neuscamman

摘要:

我们测试了激发态平均场论及其特定激发态微扰理论对K边位置和X射线峰间距的预测效果。我们发现,平均场论是令人惊讶的准确,即使它不包含帐户的微分电子相关效应。在微扰理论中,我们测试了多个核价分离方案,发现平均场论已经如此准确,在一个流行的分离方案中的电子计数偏差在预测K-边缘时成为一个主要的错误。令人高兴的是,这些似乎是相对容易纠正,导致K-边缘位置的微扰理论,这是较低的缩放和更准确的耦合集群理论和竞争力的准确性与最近的高精度结果从限制开壳层Kohn Sham理论。对于峰分离,我们的初步数据显示,激发态平均场论是非常准确的,但更广泛的测试将需要看到它和它的微扰理论相比,耦合集群峰分离更广泛。

英文摘要:

We test the efficacy of excited state mean field theory and its excited-state-specific perturbation theory on the prediction of K-edge positions and X-ray peak separations. We find that the mean field theory is surprisingly accurate, even though it contains no accounting of differential electron correlation effects. In the perturbation theory, we test multiple core-valence separation schemes and find that, with the mean field theory already so accurate, electron-counting biases in one popular separation scheme become a dominant error when predicting K-edges. Happily, these appear to be relatively easy to correct for, leading to a perturbation theory for K-edge positions that is lower scaling and more accurate than coupled cluster theory and competitive in accuracy with recent high-accuracy results from restricted open-shell Kohn Sham theory. For peak separations, our preliminary data show excited state mean field theory to be exceptionally accurate, but more extensive testing will be needed to see how it and its perturbation theory compare to coupled cluster peak separations more broadly.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑