arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2003.07971math.NAcs.NA
收藏

迭代变换法

The Iterative Transformation Method

Riccardo Fazio

摘要:

在变换方法中,通过求解一个或多个相关的初值问题来获得给定边值问题的数值解。因此,变换方法,如打靶法,是初始值方法。变换法与打靶法的主要区别在于变换法是从标度不变性理论出发的。本文讨论了迭代变换法在边界层理论中几个问题中的应用。迭代法是T{}pfer的非迭代算法的扩展,作为解决著名的Blasius问题的一种简单方法。这种迭代法为解的存在性和唯一性提供了一个简单的数值检验。在这里,我们展示了如何的方法可以应用到一个齐次边界条件在无穷远的问题,特别是我们解决了Sakiadis问题的边界层理论。此外,我们展示了如何耦合我们的方法与牛顿的寻根。所得的数值结果与文献中的结果进行了比较。这里的主要目的是,任何方法开发的Blasius,或Sakiadis,问题可能会扩展到更具有挑战性或有趣的问题。在这种情况下,迭代变换方法最近已被应用于计算法克纳-斯坎模型的正常和反向流Stewartson的解决方案[COMPUT。\& Fluids,{ \bf 73}(2013)pp. 202-209]。

英文摘要:

In a transformation method, the numerical solution of a given boundary value problem is obtained by solving one or more related initial value problems. Therefore, a transformation method, like a shooting method, is an initial value method. The main difference between a transformation and a shooting method is that the former is conceived and derive its formulation from the scaling invariance theory. This paper is concerned with the application of the iterative transformation method to several problems in the boundary layer theory. The iterative method is an extension of the T{ö}pfer's non-iterative algorithm developed as a simple way to solve the celebrated Blasius problem. This iterative method provides a simple numerical test for the existence and uniqueness of solutions. Here we show how the method can be applied to problems with a homogeneous boundary conditions at infinity and in particular we solve the Sakiadis problem of boundary layer theory. Moreover, we show how to couple our method with Newton's root-finder. The obtained numerical results compare well with those available in the literature. The main aim here is that any method developed for the Blasius, or the Sakiadis, problem might be extended to more challenging or interesting problems. In this context, the iterative transformation method has been recently applied to compute the normal and reverse flow solutions of Stewartson for the Falkner-Skan model [Comput. \& Fluids, {\bf 73} (2013) pp. 202-209].

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑