arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1908.02297hep-thgr-qc
收藏

Holographic entanglement entropy is cutoff-covariant

Jonathan Sorce

英文摘要:

In the AdS/CFT correspondence, it is often convenient to regulate infinite quantities in asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes by introducing a sharp cutoff in a radial coordinate. This procedure is a priori coordinate-dependent, and may not be well-motivated in full, covariant general relativity; however, the fact that physically meaningful quantities such as the entanglement entropy can be obtained by such a regulation procedure suggests some underlying covariance. In this paper, we provide a careful treatment of the radial cutoff procedure for computing holographic entanglement entropy in asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes. We prove two results that are frequently assumed in the literature, but that have not been carefully addressed: (i) that the choice of a "globally minimal surface" among several extremal candidates is independent of the choice of regulator, and (ii) that finite CFT quantities such as the mutual information which involve "divergence-cancelling" sums of holographic entanglement entropies are well-defined. Our results imply that the "globally minimal surface" prescription for computing holographic entanglement entropy is well-posed from the perspective of general relativity, and thus support the belief that this is the correct prescription for identifying the entanglement wedge of a boundary subregion in AdS/CFT. We also comment on the geometric source of state-dependent divergences in the holographic entanglement entropy, and identify precisely the regime of validity of the "vacuum subtraction" protocol for regulating infinite entanglement entropies in arbitrary states by comparing them to the entanglement entropies of identical regions in the vacuum. Our proofs make use of novel techniques for the covariant analysis of extremal surfaces, which are explained in detail and may find use more broadly in the study of holographic entanglement entropy.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑