arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1809.06175hep-ph
收藏

赝标极对$a_μ$强子逐光段的贡献

Pseudoscalar pole contribution to the hadronic light-by-light piece of $a_μ$

Adolfo Guevara, Pablo Roig, JJ Sanz Cillero

摘要:

我们研究了共振手征理论中的$P\toγ^\starγ^\star$形状因子,用$P = π^0,η,η'$计算了赝标极对μ子反常磁矩的强子逐光段的贡献.在这项工作中,我们允许领先的$U(3)$手征对称性破缺条款,获得最一般的表达式为顺序$\mathcal{O}(m_P^2)$的形状因子。有效场论的参数是通过对形状因子的短距离约束和与QCD的预期行为相匹配来获得的。那些不能用这种方法固定的参数,可以用虚光子类空动量区内形状因子的实验测定来拟合。手征对称关系之间的过渡形状因子为$π^0,η$和$η'$允许同时适合三个介子的实验数据。这表明BaBar $π^0$数据与其余实验输入之间不一致。因此,我们找到了$a_μ^{P,HLbL}=(8.47\pm 0.16)\cdot 10^{-10}$的总赝标量极点贡献,用于我们的最佳拟合(忽略BaBar $π^0$数据)。此外,对$1/N_C$校正和更高矢量多重态(asym)中NLO影响的初步粗略估计将不确定性扩大到$a_μ^{P,HLbL}=(8.47\pm 0.16_{\rm stat}\pm 0.09_{N_C}{}^{+0.5}_{-0.0_{\rm asym}})$

英文摘要:

We have studied the $P\toγ^\starγ^\star$ form factor in Resonance Chiral Theory, with $P = π^0,η,η'$, to compute the contribution of the pseudoscalar pole to the hadronic light-by-light piece of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon. In this work we allow the leading $U(3)$ chiral symmetry breaking terms, obtaining the most general expression for the form factor of order $\mathcal{O}(m_P^2)$. The parameters of the Effective Field Theory are obtained by means of short distance constraints on the form factor and matching with the expected behavior from QCD. Those parameters that cannot be fixed in this way are fitted to experimental determinations of the form factor within the spacelike momentum region of the virtual photon. Chiral symmetry relations among the transition form factors for $π^0,η$ and $η'$ allow for a simultaneous fit to experimental data for the three mesons. This shows an inconsistency between the BaBar $π^0$ data and the rest of the experimental inputs. Thus, we find a total pseudoscalar pole contribution of $a_μ^{P,HLbL}=(8.47\pm 0.16)\cdot 10^{-10}$ for our best fit (neglecting the BaBar $π^0$ data). Also, a preliminary rough estimate of the impact of NLO in $1/N_C$ corrections and higher vector multiplets (asym) enlarges the uncertainty up to $a_μ^{P,HLbL}=(8.47\pm 0.16_{\rm stat}\pm 0.09_{N_C}{}^{+0.5}_{-0.0_{\rm asym}})$

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑