arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1502.05803cs.CV

Visual object tracking performance measures revisited

Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana(卢布尔雅那大学计算机与信息科学学院);Centre for Computational Neuroscience and Cognitive Robotics, University of Birmingham(伯明翰大学计算神经科学与认知机器人中心)

Luka Čehovin, Aleš Leonardis, Matej Kristan

英文摘要:

The problem of visual tracking evaluation is sporting a large variety of performance measures, and largely suffers from lack of consensus about which measures should be used in experiments. This makes the cross-paper tracker comparison difficult. Furthermore, as some measures may be less effective than others, the tracking results may be skewed or biased towards particular tracking aspects. In this paper we revisit the popular performance measures and tracker performance visualizations and analyze them theoretically and experimentally. We show that several measures are equivalent from the point of information they provide for tracker comparison and, crucially, that some are more brittle than the others. Based on our analysis we narrow down the set of potential measures to only two complementary ones, describing accuracy and robustness, thus pushing towards homogenization of the tracker evaluation methodology. These two measures can be intuitively interpreted and visualized and have been employed by the recent Visual Object Tracking (VOT) challenges as the foundation for the evaluation methodology.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑