arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1402.6980astro-ph.COhep-th
收藏

Planck2013之后的通货膨胀分裂

Inflationary schism after Planck2013

Anna Ijjas, Paul J. Steinhardt, Abraham Loeb

摘要:

经典的暴胀理论,在教科书中描述的理论,是基于这样的想法,从典型的初始条件开始,并假设一个简单的暴胀子势与最小的微调,暴胀可以创建指数大体积的空间,一般是均匀的,各向同性和平坦的,几乎尺度不变的密度谱和引力波波动是绝热的,高斯的,并具有一般的可预测的属性。在最近的一篇论文中,我们表明,除了几十年来已知的某些概念问题外,经典暴胀首次也不受数据的青睐,特别是来自WMAP,ACT和普朗克2013的最新数据。古斯、凯泽、野村和林德最近都发表了对我们论文的批评,但是,正如在这里明确指出的那样,我们都同意一件事:经典通货膨胀的问题状态。相反,他们描述了另一种通货膨胀范式,它修改了通货膨胀的假设和目标,也许是一般的科学。

英文摘要:

Classic inflation, the theory described in textbooks, is based on the idea that, beginning from typical initial conditions and assuming a simple inflaton potential with a minimum of fine-tuning, inflation can create exponentially large volumes of space that are generically homogeneous, isotropic and flat, with nearly scale-invariant spectra of density and gravitational wave fluctuations that are adiabatic, Gaussian and have generic predictable properties. In a recent paper, we showed that, in addition to having certain conceptual problems known for decades, classic inflation is for the first time also disfavored by data, specifically the most recent data from WMAP, ACT and Planck2013. Guth, Kaiser and Nomura and Linde have each recently published critiques of our paper, but, as made clear here, we all agree about one thing: the problematic state of classic inflation. Instead, they describe an alternative inflationary paradigm that revises the assumptions and goals of inflation, and perhaps of science generally.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑