arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1306.2993quant-phgr-qc
收藏

量子力学从物理性质之间关系的单一基本修正推导出来

Derivation of quantum mechanics from a single fundamental modification of the relations between physical properties

Holger F. Hofmann

摘要:

最近在量子测量中得到的结果表明,系统的三个物理性质之间的基本关系可以用复条件概率来表示。在这里,它表明,这些关系提供了一个完全确定的和普遍有效的框架,所有的量子力学可以基于。具体地说,量子力学可以通过将贝叶斯概率论的规则与解释复概率相位的唯一附加定律相结合而导出。这个定律,我在这里介绍的量子遍历定律,是基于这样的观察,即物理性质的实在性不能与它们在测量相互作用中出现的动力学分离。复相位是这种不可分离性的一种表达,代表了不同性质之间变换的动态结构。量子遍历性定律以其定量形式描述了通过动态平均获得的遍历概率与由复条件概率表示的三个属性之间的确定性关系之间的基本关系。量子力学的完整形式可以从这个关系式中推导出来,而不需要任何关于态矢量或叠加的公理化数学假设。因此,所有的量子现象都可以解释为一个物理学基本定律的结果。

英文摘要:

Recent results obtained in quantum measurements indicate that the fundamental relations between three physical properties of a system can be represented by complex conditional probabilities. Here, it is shown that these relations provide a fully deterministic and universally valid framework on which all of quantum mechanics can be based. Specifically, quantum mechanics can be derived by combining the rules of Bayesian probability theory with only a single additional law that explains the phases of complex probabilities. This law, which I introduce here as the law of quantum ergodicity, is based on the observation that the reality of physical properties cannot be separated from the dynamics by which they emerge in measurement interactions. The complex phases are an expression of this inseparability and represent the dynamical structure of transformations between the different properties. In its quantitative form, the law of quantum ergodicity describes a fundamental relation between the ergodic probabilities obtained by dynamical averaging and the deterministic relations between three properties expressed by the complex conditional probabilities. The complete formalism of quantum mechanics can be derived from this one relation, without any axiomatic mathematical assumptions about state vectors or superpositions. It is therefore possible to explain all quantum phenomena as the consequence of a single fundamental law of physics.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑