arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1111.3044gr-qcphysics.data-an
收藏

先进探测器时代刻度误差对内旋双星引力波信号贝叶斯参数估计的影响

Effect of calibration errors on Bayesian parameter estimation for gravitational wave signals from inspiral binary systems in the advanced detectors era

Salvatore Vitale, Walter Del Pozzo, Tjonnie G. F. Li, Chris Van Den Broeck, Ilya Mandel, Ben Aylott, John Veitch

摘要:

到2015年,先进版本的引力波探测器Virgo和LIGO将上线。他们将收集数据,同时具有足够的灵敏度,以潜在地从致密物体二进制的吸气中提供对引力波的多次探测。这项工作的重点是了解在干涉仪校准的不确定性所带来的影响。我们认为合理的校准误差的基础上获得的估计在LIGO的第五次和处女座的第三次科学运行,其中包括频率依赖的幅度误差$\sim 10%$和频率依赖的相位误差$\sim 3$度在每个仪器。我们量化的后果,这样的错误估计参数的吸气二进制文件。我们发现,系统引入的校准误差的啁啾质量和质量比的推断值小于20%的统计测量不确定性参数估计的90%的信号在我们的模拟目录。同时,校正引起的系统性在推断的天空位置的信号小于$\sim 50%$的统计不确定度。因此,我们得出结论,在这个水平上的校准引起的错误是不是一个显着的损害准确的参数估计。

英文摘要:

By 2015 the advanced versions of the gravitational-wave detectors Virgo and LIGO will be online. They will collect data in coincidence with enough sensitivity to potentially deliver multiple detections of gravitation waves from inspirals of compact-object binaries. This work is focused on understanding the effects introduced by uncertainties in the calibration of the interferometers. We consider plausible calibration errors based on estimates obtained during LIGO's fifth and Virgo's third science runs, which include frequency-dependent amplitude errors of $\sim 10%$ and frequency-dependent phase errors of $\sim 3$ degrees in each instrument. We quantify the consequences of such errors estimating the parameters of inspiraling binaries. We find that the systematics introduced by calibration errors on the inferred values of the chirp mass and mass ratio are smaller than 20% of the statistical measurement uncertainties in parameter estimation for 90% of signals in our mock catalog. Meanwhile, the calibration-induced systematics in the inferred sky location of the signal are smaller than $\sim 50%$ of the statistical uncertainty. We thus conclude that calibration-induced errors at this level are not a significant detriment to accurate parameter estimation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑