arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1004.4528q-bio.PE
收藏

多样性、竞争、消亡:语言变化的生态物理学

Diversity, competition, extinction: the ecophysics of language change

Ricard V. Solé, Bernat Corominas-Murtra, Jordi Fortuny

摘要:

正如查尔斯·达尔文(Charles Darwin)早期指出的那样,语言的行为和变化非常像生物物种。它们表现出高度的多样性,在空间和时间上有所区别,出现和消失。大量的文献探讨了在选择性情景下,信息交流和沟通约束在代理群体中的作用。这些模型非常有助于为复杂的交流形式如何在进化压力下出现提供理论基础。然而,大规模组织的其他模式可以用数学方法来描述,忽略了沟通的特点。这些方法考虑较短的时间尺度,并已开发利用理论生态学和统计物理方法。这些模式包括灭绝、入侵、起源、空间组织、共存和多样性等关键概念,其定义规则非常简单。这样的简单性是为了抓住组织的最基本的规律和那些负责质量特征的普遍成分。观察到的和预测的模式之间的相似之处表明,语言的生态理论正在出现,支持(在定量的基础上)其生态性质,虽然关键的差异也存在。在这里,我们批判性地回顾了一些最新的进展,并概述了它们的影响和局限性,以及未来研究的开放问题。

英文摘要:

As early indicated by Charles Darwin, languages behave and change very much like living species. They display high diversity, differentiate in space and time, emerge and disappear. A large body of literature has explored the role of information exchanges and communicative constraints in groups of agents under selective scenarios. These models have been very helpful in providing a rationale on how complex forms of communication emerge under evolutionary pressures. However, other patterns of large-scale organization can be described using mathematical methods ignoring communicative traits. These approaches consider shorter time scales and have been developed by exploiting both theoretical ecology and statistical physics methods. The models are reviewed here and include extinction, invasion, origination, spatial organization, coexistence and diversity as key concepts and are very simple in their defining rules. Such simplicity is used in order to catch the most fundamental laws of organization and those universal ingredients responsible for qualitative traits. The similarities between observed and predicted patterns indicate that an ecological theory of language is emerging, supporting (on a quantitative basis) its ecological nature, although key differences are also present. Here we critically review some recent advances lying and outline their implications and limitations as well as open problems for future research.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑