arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0812.0678quant-phhep-thmath-phmath.MP
收藏

Does a functional integral really need a Lagrangian?

Denis Kochan

英文摘要:

Path integral formulation of quantum mechanics (and also other equivalent formulations) depends on a Lagrangian and/or Hamiltonian function that is chosen to describe the underlying classical system. The arbitrariness presented in this choice leads to a phenomenon called Quantization ambiguity. For example both $L_1=\dot{q}^2$ and $L_2=e^\dot{q}$ are suitable Lagrangians on a classical level ($δL_1=0=δL_2$), but quantum mechanically they are diverse. This paper presents a simple rearrangement of the path integral to a surface functional integral. It is shown that the surface functional integral formulation gives transition probability amplitude which is free of any Lagrangian/Hamiltonian and requires just the underlying classical equations of motion. A simple example examining the functionality of the proposed method is considered.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑