arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv physics/0702129physics.plasm-ph
收藏

负流光头中局部场近似的偏差

Deviations from the local field approximation in negative streamer heads

Chao Li, W. J. M. Brok, Ute Ebert, J. J. A. M. van der Mullen

摘要:

在局域场近似下,分别用粒子模型和流体模型研究了正常条件下氮气中的负流光电离锋。流体模型的参数函数来自粒子模型中的群实验。在一维环境中研究了内尺度上的前结构,允许合理的运行时间和内存消耗以及高数值精度,而不引入超粒子。当前沿的约化电场>= 50 kV/(cm bar)时,流体模型和粒子模型的解吻合得很好。当电场强度增加到200 kV/(cm bar)时,粒子模型和流体模型的解发生了偏离,特别是粒子模型的前沿后电离水平提高了60%,而速度对前沿的电离水平不敏感。粒子和流体模型偏离,因为高能量的电子还没有完全从前面跑走,而是在一定程度上领先。这导致粒子模型中前沿尖端的电离率增加。在同一电场中,前沿电子的能量过冲实际上与电子群或雪崩前沿的能量过冲在数量上一致。

英文摘要:

Negative streamer ionization fronts in nitrogen under normal conditions are investigated both in a particle model and in a fluid model in local field approximation. The parameter functions for the fluid model are derived from swarm experiments in the particle model. The front structure on the inner scale is investigated in a 1D setting, allowing reasonable run-time and memory consumption and high numerical accuracy without introducing super-particles. If the reduced electric field immediately before the front is >= 50kV/(cm bar), solutions of fluid and particle model agree very well. If the field increases up to 200kV/(cm bar), the solutions of particle and fluid model deviate, in particular, the ionization level behind the front becomes up to 60% higher in the particle model while the velocity is rather insensitive. Particle and fluid model deviate because electrons with high energies do not yet fully run away from the front, but are somewhat ahead. This leads to increasing ionization rates in the particle model at the very tip of the front. The energy overshoot of electrons in the leading edge of the front actually agrees quantitatively with the energy overshoot in the leading edge of an electron swarm or avalanche in the same electric field.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑