arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv physics/0507120physics.soc-ph
收藏

微观三相交通流理论的确定性方法

Deterministic approach to microscopic three-phase traffic theory

Boris S. Kerner, Sergey L. Klenov

摘要:

介绍了两种不同的确定性微观交通流模型,这两种模型都是在Kerner的三相交通流理论的背景下建立的。在加速时间延迟模型(ATD模型)中,与各种本地驾驶情况下的驾驶员行为相关联的驾驶员加速中的不同时间延迟被明确地并入到模型中。车辆加速度取决于当地的交通状况,即,驾驶员是否处于自由流、同步流或宽移动堵塞交通阶段内。在速度自适应模型(SA模型)中,车辆速度自适应根据驾驶条件在同步流中发生。结果发现,ATD和SA模型显示时空拥挤的交通模式,是足够的经验结果。在ATD-和SA-模型中,在高速公路瓶颈处的自由流中的拥塞的发生与从自由流到同步流的一阶相变相关联;仅在同步流中自发地出现移动堵塞。ATD和SA模型之间的差异进行了研究。ATD-和SA-模型与随机模型在三相交通理论的背景下进行了比较。对基于基本图方法的早期交通流理论和模型进行了批判性的讨论。

英文摘要:

Two different deterministic microscopic traffic flow models, which are in the context of the Kerner's there-phase traffic theory, are introduced. In an acceleration time delay model (ATD-model), different time delays in driver acceleration associated with driver behaviour in various local driving situations are explicitly incorporated into the model. Vehicle acceleration depends on local traffic situation, i.e., whether a driver is within the free flow, or synchronized flow, or else wide moving jam traffic phase. In a speed adaptation model (SA-model), vehicle speed adaptation occurs in synchronized flow depending on driving conditions. It is found that the ATD- and SA-models show spatiotemporal congested traffic patterns that are adequate with empirical results. In the ATD- and SA-models, the onset of congestion in free flow at a freeway bottleneck is associated with a first-order phase transition from free flow to synchronized flow; moving jams emerge spontaneously in synchronized flow only. Differences between the ATD- and SA-models are studied. A comparison of the ATD- and SA-models with stochastic models in the context of three phase traffic theory is made. A critical discussion of earlier traffic flow theories and models based on the fundamental diagram approach is presented.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑