arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv math/0607181math.NAcs.NAmath.AP

三维Navier-Stokes方程的后验正则性:来自数值计算

A Posteriori Regularity of the Three-dimensional Navier-Stokes Equations from Numerical Computations

Sergei I. Chernyshenko, Peter Constantin, James C. Robinson, Edriss S. Titi

AI总结:

本文通过Galerkin近似数值计算,提出一种后验检验方法,用于保证三维Navier-Stokes方程强解的存在性,并证明若强解存在则数值方法收敛,从而在缺乏严格存在唯一性证明的情况下实现解的严格计算。

摘要:

本文考虑数值计算(特别是Galerkin近似)在由三维Navier-Stokes方程建模的问题中所起的作用,目前该方程尚无严格证明的独特解存在性。我们证明了强解的鲁棒性定理,由此推导出一种后验检验,可应用于数值解以保证相应精确问题的强解存在。然后我们考虑Galerkin近似,并表明如果强解存在,Galerkin近似将收敛到它;因此,如果愿意假设Navier-Stokes方程是正则的,就可以严格证明这种数值方法的合理性。结合这两个结果,我们证明如果精确问题的强解存在,则可以通过一种保证在有限时间内终止的算法进行数值验证。因此,我们引入了对三维Navier-Stokes方程解进行严格计算的可能性(尽管缺乏严格的存在唯一性结果),并证明数值研究可用于排除特定例子中可能出现的奇点。

英文摘要:

In this paper we consider the rôle that numerical computations -- in particular Galerkin approximations -- can play in problems modelled by the 3d Navier-Stokes equations, for which no rigorous proof of the existence of unique solutions is currently available. We prove a robustness theorem for strong solutions, from which we derive an {\it a posteriori} check that can be applied to a numerical solution to guarantee the existence of a strong solution of the corresponding exact problem. We then consider Galerkin approximations, and show that {\it if} a strong solution exists the Galerkin approximations will converge to it; thus if one is prepared to assume that the Navier-Stokes equations are regular one can justify this particular numerical method rigorously. Combining these two results we show that if a strong solution of the exact problem exists then this can be verified numerically using an algorithm that can be guaranteed to terminate in a finite time. We thus introduce the possibility of rigorous computations of the solutions of the 3d Navier-Stokes equations (despite the lack of rigorous existence and uniqueness results), and demonstrate that numerical investigation can be used to rule out the occurrence of possible singularities in particular examples.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑