arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv math/0206258math.GTmath.GR
收藏

非对易纽结理论

Noncommutative knot theory

Tim D. Cochran

摘要:

纽结的经典交换不变量是Alexander模,它是S^3-K的唯一无限循环覆盖空间的第一同调群,被认为是(交换)Laurent多项式环上的模,以及在这个模上定义的Blanchfield连接对。从纽结群G的角度来看,这些不变量反映了G^(1)/G^(2)作为G/G^(1)上的模的结构(这里G^(n)是G的导出列的第n项)。因此,任何与G^(2)相关的现象对于阿贝尔不变量都是不可见的。本文系统地研究了纽结外部可解覆盖空间的不变量,特别是研究了我们称之为n阶高阶Alexander模G^(n+1)/G^(n+2),它被认为是Z[G/G^(n+1)$-模。我们发现,这些模块共享几乎所有的经典亚历山大模块的属性。它们是具有高阶Alexander多项式的扭模,其阶给出了纽结亏格的下界。这些模块具有从组表示或从塞弗特曲面导出的表示矩阵。他们承认更高阶的连接形式表现出自我对偶性。它可以应用于估计纽结的亏格和检测纤维纽结、素纽结和交错纽结。还有令人惊讶的应用程序,以检测辛结构的4流形。这些模与作者Kent Orr和Peter Teichner所考虑的模相似但不同,并且是Shelly Harvey随后考虑的任意3-流形的模的特例。

英文摘要:

The classical abelian invariants of a knot are the Alexander module, which is the first homology group of the the unique infinite cyclic covering space of S^3-K, considered as a module over the (commutative) Laurent polynomial ring, and the Blanchfield linking pairing defined on this module. From the perspective of the knot group, G, these invariants reflect the structure of G^(1)/G^(2) as a module over G/G^(1) (here G^(n) is the n-th term of the derived series of G). Hence any phenomenon associated to G^(2) is invisible to abelian invariants. This paper begins the systematic study of invariants associated to solvable covering spaces of knot exteriors, in particular the study of what we call the n-th higher-order Alexander module, G^(n+1)/G^(n+2), considered as a Z[G/G^(n+1)$-module. We show that these modules share almost all of the properties of the classical Alexander module. They are torsion modules with higher-order Alexander polynomials whose degrees give lower bounds for the knot genus. The modules have presentation matrices derived either from a group presentation or from a Seifert surface. They admit higher-order linking forms exhibiting self-duality. There are applications to estimating knot genus and to detecting fibered, prime and alternating knots. There are also surprising applications to detecting symplectic structures on 4-manifolds. These modules are similar to but different from those considered by the author, Kent Orr and Peter Teichner and are special cases of the modules considered subsequently by Shelly Harvey for arbitrary 3-manifolds.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑