arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2606.02485hep-phhep-th
收藏

费曼积分IBP约化中的跨切割一致性问题的研究

On the spanning cuts consistency problem in the IBP reductions of Feynman integrals

State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University(华南师范大学量子物质研究所核物理与技术国家重点实验室);Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Structure and Fundamental Interactions of Matter, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science(广东省核科学重点实验室结构及基本相互作用卓越基础研究中心);Institute for Theoretical Particle Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)(卡尔斯鲁厄理工学院理论粒子物理研究所)

Zihao Wu, Yingxuan Xu

AI总结:

本文揭示了费曼积分IBP约化中跨切割系数不一致的机制,指出切割引入的pinch奇异性抵消了消失的费曼规范参数,导致隐藏项变为有限,忽略这些项是误差来源,并提出了寻找线性隐藏关系的算法。

摘要:

跨切割方法是一种在计算费曼积分时降低IBP约化成本的有效方法。然而,由于所谓的一致性问题,其使用受到限制。目前尚不清楚为什么不同切割之间的IBP约化系数可能不一致。在本文中,我们报告了这种不一致背后的机制。我们发现,如果盲目地忽略关系中与“消失”的费曼规范参数成比例的隐藏项,则切割下的IBP关系可能被违反。在某些情况下,切割引入了pinch奇异性,这些奇异性抵消了消失的费曼规范参数,使得隐藏项变为有限。在各种情况下,误差来自忽略这些有限的隐藏项。我们还声称,切割下的pinch奇异性与传播子之间的某些隐藏关系有关。在本文中,我们提供了一种算法及其实现来寻找线性隐藏关系。

英文摘要:

The spanning cuts method is a powerful approach to reduce the cost of IBP reduction while computing Feynman integrals. However, its usage is limited due to the so-called consistency problem. It was unclear why the IBP reduction coefficients can be inconsistent with each other between different cuts. In this paper, we report a mechanism behind this inconsistency. We found that the IBP relations can be violated under the cuts, if we blindly erase the hidden terms that are proportional to the ``vanishing'' Feynman prescription parameters in the relations. In some cases, the cut introduces pinch singularities, which cancel the vanishing Feynman prescription parameters, making the hidden terms finite. In various cases, the error comes from omitting such finite hidden terms. We also claimed that the pinch singularity under the cuts are related to some hidden relations between the propagators. In this paper, we provide an algorithm and its implementation to find the linear hidden relations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑