arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.04725cs.LGeess.SP
收藏

基于PPG的无创血压估计方法的基准测试与增强

Benchmarking and Enhancing PPG-Based Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation Methods

Department of Engineering Technology, University of Houston, Texas, USA(工程科技系,休斯顿大学,德克萨斯州,美国);Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Houston, Texas, USA(电气与计算机工程系,休斯顿大学,德克萨斯州,美国);Department of Information Science Technology, University of Houston, Texas, USA(信息科学科技系,休斯顿大学,德克萨斯州,美国);Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Texas, USA(心血管外科系,休斯顿方法医院,德克萨斯州,美国);Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Texas, USA(生物医学工程系,休斯顿大学,德克萨斯州,美国)

Neville Mathew, Yidan Shen, Renjie Hu, Maham Rahimi, George Zouridakis

AI总结:

本文通过构建标准化数据集NBPDB,评估了多种基于PPG的血压估计模型,发现其未达到临床标准,但通过加入人口统计数据显著提升了模型的准确性和生理有效性。

摘要:

基于易于获取的光体积脉搏图(PPG)信号的无创血压筛查提供了一条通往可扩展心血管健康评估的实用途径。尽管进展迅速,现有的基于PPG的血压估计模型尚未一致达到已建立的临床数值标准,如AAMI/ISO 81060-2,并且先前的评估往往缺乏必要的严格实验控制以进行有效的临床评估。此外,常用的公开数据集通常是异质的,并且缺乏生理控制条件以进行公平的基准测试。为了在生理控制条件下实现公平的基准测试,我们创建了一个标准化基准测试子集NBPDB,包含来自1103名健康成年人的101,453个高质量PPG片段,这些数据来自MIMIC-III和VitalDB。使用此数据集,我们系统地评估了几种最先进的基于PPG的模型。结果显示,评估的模型中没有一个达到AAMI/ISO 81060-2的准确性要求(均方误差<5 mmHg,标准差<8 mmHg)。为了提高模型的准确性,我们修改了这些模型,并添加了患者人口统计数据,如年龄、性别和体重指数作为额外的输入。我们的修改在所有模型中都一致提高了性能。特别是,MInception模型在添加人口统计数据后将误差降低了23%,获得了4.75 mmHg(收缩压)和2.90 mmHg(舒张压)的平均绝对误差,实现了与AAMI/ISO准确性标准定义的准确性相当的水平。我们的结果表明,现有的基于PPG的血压估计模型在标准化条件下缺乏临床实用性,而加入人口统计数据显著提高了其准确性和生理有效性。

英文摘要:

Cuffless blood pressure screening based on easily acquired photoplethysmography (PPG) signals offers a practical pathway toward scalable cardiovascular health assessment. Despite rapid progress, existing PPG-based blood pressure estimation models have not consistently achieved the established clinical numerical limits such as AAMI/ISO 81060-2, and prior evaluations often lack the rigorous experimental controls necessary for valid clinical assessment. Moreover, the publicly available datasets commonly used are heterogeneous and lack physiologically controlled conditions for fair benchmarking. To enable fair benchmarking under physiologically controlled conditions, we created a standardized benchmarking subset NBPDB comprising 101,453 high-quality PPG segments from 1,103 healthy adults, derived from MIMIC-III and VitalDB. Using this dataset, we systematically benchmarked several state-of-the-art PPG-based models. The results showed that none of the evaluated models met the AAMI/ISO 81060-2 accuracy requirements (mean error $<$ 5 mmHg and standard deviation $<$ 8 mmHg). To improve model accuracy, we modified these models and added patient demographic data such as age, sex, and body mass index as additional inputs. Our modifications consistently improved performance across all models. In particular, the MInception model reduced error by 23\% after adding the demographic data and yielded mean absolute errors of 4.75 mmHg (SBP) and 2.90 mmHg (DBP), achieves accuracy comparable to the numerical limits defined by AAMI/ISO accuracy standards. Our results show that existing PPG-based BP estimation models lack clinical practicality under standardized conditions, while incorporating demographic information markedly improves their accuracy and physiological validity.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑