Legal Infrastructure for Transformative AI Governance
Gillian K. Hadfield
备注：
arXiv admin comment: This version has been removed by arXiv administrators as the submitter did not have the rights to agree to the license at the time of submission
Most of our AI governance efforts focus on substance: what rules do we want in place? What limits or checks do we want to impose on AI development and deployment? But a key role for law is not only to establish substantive rules but also to establish legal and regulatory infrastructure to generate and implement rules. The transformative nature of AI calls especially for attention to building legal and regulatory frameworks. In this PNAS Perspective piece I review three examples I have proposed: the creation of registration regimes for frontier models; the creation of registration and identification regimes for autonomous agents; and the design of regulatory markets to facilitate a role for private companies to innovate and deliver AI regulatory services.
The AI Legal Specialist: A Juridically Autonomous Professional Profile for AI Governance
Studio Legale Fabiano, Italy（意大利法务工作室Fabiano）；Independent Researcher on Artificial Intelligence, Data Protection, and Privacy（人工智能、数据保护与隐私独立研究员）；Expert in the EDPB’s Support Pool of Experts — Field B: Legal Expertise in New Technologies（欧洲数据保护委员会（EDPB）专家支持池——领域B：新技术法律专长）；Member, IEEE SA P7007 Working Group on Ontological Standards for Ethically Driven Robotics（IEEE SA P7007工作组成员：伦理驱动机器人学的本体标准）；Member, Editorial Advisory Board, Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (JSCI)（《系统学、控制论与信息学杂志》（JSCI）编辑顾问委员会成员）；Member, International Institute of Informatics and Systemics (IIIS)（国际信息与系统学研究院（IIIS）成员）；Member, International Neural Network Society (INNS)（国际神经网络学会（INNS）成员）；Member, United Nations University AI Network (UNU AI Network)（联合国大学人工智能网络（UNU AI Network）成员）
Challenges and Best Practices in Corporate AI Governance:Lessons from the Biopharmaceutical Industry
Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford（牛津大学牛津互联网研究院）；Center for Information Technology Policy, Princeton University（普林斯顿大学信息技术政策中心）；AstraZeneca（阿斯利康）；University of Bologna（博洛尼亚大学）
A Methodology for Auditable Trustworthiness Levels in AI Lifecycle Governance
Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zürich（生物医学伦理与医学史研究所，苏黎世大学）；SUPSI, Dalle Molle Institute for Artificial Intelligence (IDSIA)（SUPSI人工智能研究所）；ETH Zürich（苏黎世联邦理工学院）
A Framework for Responsible AI Systems: Building Societal Trust through Domain Definition, Trustworthy AI Design, Auditability, Accountability, and Governance
Deparment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence and Andalusian Research Institute in Data Science and Computational Intelligence (DaSCI), University of Granada（计算机科学与人工智能系和安达卢西亚数据科学与计算智能研究所（DaSCI），格拉纳达大学）；TECNALIA (BRTA)（TECNALIA（BRTA））；University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)（巴斯克大学（UPV/EHU））；School of Engineering, Cornell University（工程学院，康奈尔大学）；ADIA Lab（ADIA实验室）；Computational Research Department, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory（计算研究部，劳伦斯伯克利国家实验室）；Intelligent Systems for Robotics and Automation Laboratory, Macau University of Science and Technology（机器人与自动化智能系统实验室，澳门科学技术大学）
Responsible AI Adoption in the Public Sector: A Data-Centric Taxonomy of AI Adoption Challenges
University of Tartu（塔尔图大学）；University of Hradec Kralove（赫拉德茨-克拉洛韦大学）；UAEM（墨西哥州自治大学）；University of Twente（特文特大学）；TU Delft（代尔夫特理工大学）；University of Warsaw（华沙大学）；Fortinet（飞塔公司）
Position: AI Governance Needs ISO-like Interoperability Protocols, Not Just Laws
Computational Intelligence and Operations Laboratory (CIOL)（计算智能与运筹实验室（CIOL））；Shahjalal University of Science and Technology（沙贾拉尔科技大学）；Independent University（独立大学）；Hanyang University（汉阳大学）；University of Oklahoma（俄克拉荷马大学）
Distributed Legal Infrastructure for a Trustworthy Agentic Web
Institute for Technoscience and Society（科技与社会研究所）；Berkeley Center for Law & Technology（伯克利法与科技中心）；U.C. Berkeley Law School（伯克利法学院）；Technical University of Munich（慕尼黑技术大学）；Università degli Studi dell’Aquila（阿奎拉大学）；University of Oxford（牛津大学）；Existential Risk Alliance（存在风险联盟）；NYU Shanghai（纽约大学上海分校）；Sun Yat-sen University（中山大学）；Shanghai Innovation Institute（上海创新研究院）；Norwegian University of Science and Technology（挪威科学技术大学）
DIRF: A Framework for Digital Identity Protection and Clone Governance in Agentic AI Systems
Qorvex Consulting & Roshan Consulting（Qorvex咨询公司与Roshan咨询公司）；Wentworth Institute of Higher Education & Machine Learning Professional（威斯敏斯特高等教育学院及机器学习专业）；Skylink Antenna（Skylink天线研究所）；Eviden Saudi Arabia（Eviden沙特阿拉伯）；Deloitte（德勤）；University of British Columbia（不列颠哥伦比亚大学）
When Large Language Models Meet Law: Dual-Lens Taxonomy, Technical Advances, and Ethical Governance
School of Law, China University of Political Science and Law（中国政法大学法学院）；Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics Dongfang College（浙江财经大学东洋学院）；School of Information Management for Law, China University of Political Science and Law（中国政法大学信息管理法学院）；Department of Artificial Intelligence, Chung-Ang University（成均馆大学人工智能系）；Department of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University（香港理工大学数据科学与人工智能系）
