arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2601.04096q-fin.MFmath.PR
收藏

稀疏金融网络中的尖锐转变与系统性风险

Sharp Transitions and Systemic Risk in Sparse Financial Networks

Riley James Bendel

AI总结:

该研究分析了稀疏金融网络中系统性风险的传播机制,通过构建发送者截断子图 G_sh,揭示了亚临界和超临界 regime 下的系统性风险特征及冲击传播规律。

摘要:

我们研究了稀疏金融网络中在有向随机图上存在的资产负债互动中的传染性和系统性风险。每个机构具有同质的负债和股本,并且沿 outgoing 边的暴露被平均分配给对手方。稀疏有向图中线性比例的机构具有零出度;我们采用外部负债惯例,使暴露映射明确,而无需改变传播。我们隔离了单次冲击的传播机制,并通过发送者截断子图 G_sh 进行编码。我们定义了对抗性和随机的系统性事件,冲击大小为 k_n = c log n 和系统性比例 epsilon n。在亚临界 regime rho_out < 1 中,我们证明了 G_sh 中最大前向可达性以概率 O(log n),导致从冲击大小 k_n 的冲击产生 O((log n)^2) 的级联。对于随机冲击,我们给出了显式的 fan-in 积累界,显示当探索的默认集合为 polylogarithmic 时,多击默认在概率上是可忽略的。在超临界 regime 中,我们给出了 G_sh 的精确分布表示,作为具有均匀目的地的 i.i.d.-outdegree 随机有向图,将其置于 Penrose (2014) 的强巨/弓形定理的范围内。我们推导了由此导致的随机冲击系统性事件的结果。最后,我们解释了为什么尖锐阈值机制不直接适用:系统性事件属性不一定要在边集上单调递增,因为增加 outgoing 边会减少每边暴露。

英文摘要:

We study contagion and systemic risk in sparse financial networks with balance-sheet interactions on a directed random graph. Each institution has homogeneous liabilities and equity, and exposures along outgoing edges are split equally across counterparties. A linear fraction of institutions have zero out-degree in sparse digraphs; we adopt an external-liability convention that makes the exposure mapping well-defined without altering propagation. We isolate a single-hit transmission mechanism and encode it by a sender-truncated subgraph G_sh. We define adversarial and random systemic events with shock size k_n = c log n and systemic fraction epsilon n. In the subcritical regime rho_out < 1, we prove that maximal forward reachability in G_sh is O(log n) with high probability, yielding O((log n)^2) cascades from shocks of size k_n. For random shocks, we give an explicit fan-in accumulation bound, showing that multi-hit defaults are negligible with high probability when the explored default set is polylogarithmic. In the supercritical regime, we give an exact distributional representation of G_sh as an i.i.d.-outdegree random digraph with uniform destinations, placing it within the scope of the strong-giant/bow-tie theorem of Penrose (2014). We derive the resulting implication for random-shock systemic events. Finally, we explain why sharp-threshold machinery does not directly apply: systemic-event properties need not be monotone in the edge set because adding outgoing edges reduces per-edge exposure.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑