arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2512.03419cs.DScs.DMcs.LG

基于实例空间分析的最大团问题算法性能评估与预测

Comparative algorithm performance evaluation and prediction for the maximum clique problem using instance space analysis

Bharat Sharman, Elkafi Hassini

AI总结:

本研究通过实例空间分析方法,评估并预测最大团问题中不同算法的性能,发现MOMC在多数实例上表现优异,预测模型在挑战性实例上准确率高达97%。

摘要:

最大团问题是一个著名的基于图的组合优化问题,尽管已通过各种算法方法得到解决,但对问题实例的系统分析仍然稀少。本研究采用实例空间分析(ISA)方法,系统分析该问题的实例空间,并评估和预测当前最先进的(SOTA)算法,包括精确算法、启发式算法和基于图神经网络(GNN)的方法。使用来自TWITTER、COLLAB和IMDB-BINARY基准的图实例编译了一个数据集。采用了一组33个通用和2个问题特定的多项式时间可计算的图特征,包括若干谱属性。采用了一个结合解质量和算法运行时间的综合性能度量。比较分析显示,精确算法混合顺序最大团(MOMC)在由编译数据集构成的实例空间中约74.7%的范围内表现出色。Gurobi和CliSAT分别在13.8%和11%的实例空间中表现出优越性能。基于ISA的算法性能预测模型在从BHOSLIB和DIMACS数据集编译的34个具有挑战性的测试实例上运行,其top-1和top-2最佳性能预测准确率分别为88%和97%。

英文摘要:

The maximum clique problem, a well-known graph-based combinatorial optimization problem, has been addressed through various algorithmic approaches, though systematic analyses of the problem instances remain sparse. This study employs the instance space analysis (ISA) methodology to systematically analyze the instance space of this problem and assess & predict the performance of state-of-the-art (SOTA) algorithms, including exact, heuristic, and graph neural network (GNN)-based methods. A dataset was compiled using graph instances from TWITTER, COLLAB and IMDB-BINARY benchmarks commonly used in graph machine learning research. A set of 33 generic and 2 problem-specific polynomial-time-computable graph-based features, including several spectral properties, was employed for the ISA. A composite performance measure incorporating both solution quality and algorithm runtime was utilized. The comparative analysis demonstrated that the exact algorithm Mixed Order Maximum Clique (MOMC) exhibited superior performance across approximately 74.7% of the instance space constituted by the compiled dataset. Gurobi & CliSAT accounted for superior performance in 13.8% and 11% of the instance space, respectively. The ISA-based algorithm performance prediction model run on 34 challenging test instances compiled from the BHOSLIB and DIMACS datasets yielded top-1 and top-2 best performing algorithm prediction accuracies of 88% and 97%, respectively.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑