arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2510.08374cs.LG

边缘端的对比自监督学习:一种能量视角

Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning at the Edge: An Energy Perspective

University of Glasgow, UK(格拉斯哥大学);Nokia Bell Labs, Cambridge, UK(诺基亚贝尔实验室)

Fernanda Famá, Roberto Pereira, Charalampos Kalalas, Paolo Dini, Lorena Qendro, Fahim Kawsar, Mohammad Malekzadeh

AI总结:

本研究从能量视角评估了四种对比学习框架在边缘端的部署可行性,发现SimCLR能耗最低,并提出了包含能量剖析的系统基准测试策略。

摘要:

尽管对比学习(CL)在自监督表示学习方面展现出相当大的潜力,但其在资源受限设备上的部署仍未得到充分探索。训练传统对比学习框架所需的大量计算需求带来了一系列挑战,尤其是在能耗、数据可用性和内存使用方面。我们对四种广泛使用的对比学习框架进行了评估:SimCLR、MoCo、SimSiam和Barlow Twins。我们关注这些对比学习框架在边缘和雾端部署中的实际可行性,并引入了一种系统化的基准测试策略,包括能量剖析和减少训练数据条件。我们的研究结果显示,SimCLR与其被认为的计算成本相反,在各种数据规模下表现出最低的能耗。最后,我们还通过评估轻量级神经架构与对比学习框架配对时的表现来扩展我们的分析。我们的研究旨在为在计算能力有限的边缘/雾端环境中部署对比学习的资源影响提供见解,并为其未来优化开辟若干研究方向。

英文摘要:

While contrastive learning (CL) shows considerable promise in self-supervised representation learning, its deployment on resource-constrained devices remains largely underexplored. The substantial computational demands required for training conventional CL frameworks pose a set of challenges, particularly in terms of energy consumption, data availability, and memory usage. We conduct an evaluation of four widely used CL frameworks: SimCLR, MoCo, SimSiam, and Barlow Twins. We focus on the practical feasibility of these CL frameworks for edge and fog deployment, and introduce a systematic benchmarking strategy that includes energy profiling and reduced training data conditions. Our findings reveal that SimCLR, contrary to its perceived computational cost, demonstrates the lowest energy consumption across various data regimes. Finally, we also extend our analysis by evaluating lightweight neural architectures when paired with CL frameworks. Our study aims to provide insights into the resource implications of deploying CL in edge/fog environments with limited processing capabilities and opens several research directions for its future optimization.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑