arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2508.17855cs.CLcs.CY

超越人口统计学:通过多阶段人格驱动认知推理增强文化价值观调查模拟

Beyond Demographics: Enhancing Cultural Value Survey Simulation with Multi-Stage Personality-Driven Cognitive Reasoning

School of Computer Science and Technology, Wuhan University of Science and Technology(武汉科技大学计算机科学与技术学院);Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing and Real-time Industrial System, Wuhan University of Science and Technology(湖北省智能信息处理与实时工业系统重点实验室);Innovation, Policy and Entrepreneurship Thrust, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou)(香港科技大学(广州)创新、政策与创业方向);Tübingen AI Center, University of Tübingen(图宾根大学图宾根人工智能中心);Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen(哥本哈根大学计算机科学系)

Haijiang Liu, Qiyuan Li, Chao Gao, Yong Cao, Xiangyu Xu, Xun Wu, Daniel Hershcovich, Jinguang Gu

AI总结:

本文提出受MBTI类型动力学理论启发的多阶段推理框架MARK,通过生活情境压力分析等三步模拟文化价值观调查响应,在世界价值观调查实验中准确性超基线10%,可提升零样本个性化并助力模型预测解释。

摘要:

本文介绍MARK——用于文化价值观调查响应模拟的多阶段推理框架(Multi-stAge Reasoning frameworK),旨在提升大型语言模型在此任务中的准确性、可引导性和可解释性。该系统受MBTI心理框架中人格研究的类型动力学理论启发,有效预测并利用人类人口统计信息进行模拟:生活情境压力分析、群体层面人格预测及自加权认知模仿。在世界价值观调查(World Values Survey)上的实验显示,MARK的准确性优于现有基线10%,并减少了模型预测与人类偏好的偏差。这凸显了我们的框架在改进零样本个性化及帮助社会科学家解释模型预测方面的潜力。

英文摘要:

Introducing MARK, the Multi-stAge Reasoning frameworK for cultural value survey response simulation, designed to enhance the accuracy, steerability, and interpretability of large language models in this task. The system is inspired by the type dynamics theory in the MBTI psychological framework for personality research. It effectively predicts and utilizes human demographic information for simulation: life-situational stress analysis, group-level personality prediction, and self-weighted cognitive imitation. Experiments on the World Values Survey show that MARK outperforms existing baselines by 10% accuracy and reduces the divergence between model predictions and human preferences. This highlights the potential of our framework to improve zero-shot personalization and help social scientists interpret model predictions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑