arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.20294cs.CLcs.AIcs.CY

InterviewSim: 一种可扩展的基于面试的人格模拟框架

InterviewSim: A Scalable Framework for Interview-Grounded Personality Simulation

Salesforce Research(Salesforce 研究)

Yu Li, Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Yada Pruksachatkun, Chien-Sheng Wu

AI总结:

InterviewSim提出了一种基于真实面试数据的多维评估框架,通过系统比较证明基于真实访谈数据的方法在人格模拟中表现更优,并揭示了不同方法在人格风格与事实一致性方面的权衡。

摘要:

利用大型语言模型模拟真实人格需要将生成过程基于真实的个人数据进行定位。现有评估方法依赖于人口普查、性格量表或短时AI引导的面试作为替代品,但缺乏直接评估个体实际所说内容的能力。我们通过一种大规模的基于面试的评估框架来填补这一空白。我们从23000份经过验证的面试记录中提取了超过671000个问题-答案对,这些记录涵盖1000个公共人物,每人平均有11.5小时的访谈内容。我们提出了一种多维评估框架,包含四个互补的指标,分别衡量内容相似性、事实一致性、人格匹配度和事实知识保留度。通过系统比较,我们证明了基于真实访谈数据的方法在很大程度上优于仅依赖传记资料或模型参数知识的方法。我们进一步揭示了如何最佳利用访谈数据之间的权衡:检索增强方法在捕捉人格风格和回答质量方面表现优异,而时间顺序方法在保持事实一致性和知识保留方面更佳。我们的评估框架使方法选择能够基于应用需求进行原则性选择,我们的实证发现为推进人格模拟研究提供了可行的见解。

英文摘要:

Simulating real personalities with large language models requires grounding generation in authentic personal data. Existing evaluation approaches rely on demographic surveys, personality questionnaires, or short AI-led interviews as proxies, but lack direct assessment against what individuals actually said. We address this gap with an interview-grounded evaluation framework for personality simulation at a large scale. We extract over 671,000 question-answer pairs from 23,000 verified interview transcripts across 1,000 public personalities, each with an average of 11.5 hours of interview content. We propose a multi-dimensional evaluation framework with four complementary metrics measuring content similarity, factual consistency, personality alignment, and factual knowledge retention. Through systematic comparison, we find that interview grounding yields consistent gains in content alignment and exact-match factual recall over biographical profiles and parametric prompting. We further find complementary strengths: retrieval-augmented methods tend to preserve personality alignment, while larger chronological contexts generally reduce contradictions and improve factual recall. Our evaluation framework enables principled method selection based on application requirements, and our empirical findings provide actionable insights for advancing personality simulation research.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑