arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2507.02935cs.CLcs.AIcs.MA
收藏

行动中的理论思维:动态人机协作中的指令推断任务

Theory of Mind in Action: The Instruction Inference Task in Dynamic Human-Agent Collaboration

North Carolina State University(北卡罗来纳州立大学);Delft University of Technology(代尔夫特理工大学)

Fardin Saad, Pradeep K. Murukannaiah, Munindar P. Singh

AI总结:

本文提出指令推断任务,通过Tomcat模型评估人机协作中理论思维能力,实验表明Fs-CoT在GPT-4o和DeepSeek-R1上表现接近人类参与者。

摘要:

成功的人员-代理团队合作依赖于代理能够理解由人类主导者提供的指令。在许多情况下,指令可能是不完整或模糊的。在这种情况下,代理必须从共享上下文中推断未说出的意图,即必须行使主导者的理论思维(ToM)并推断主导者的心理状态。我们考虑使用大型语言模型(LLMs)有效的人机协作前景。为了在动态、目标导向和协作环境中评估ToM,我们引入了一个新的任务,即指令推断,其中代理通过解释不完整或模糊的指令来帮助主导者达成目标。我们提出了Tomcat,一个基于LLM的代理,旨在展示在解释和回应主导者指令时的ToM推理能力。我们实现了Tomcat的两个变种。一个称为Fs-CoT(Fs为少样本,CoT为推理链),基于少量示例演示所需的结构化推理。另一个称为CP(常识提示),依赖常识知识和问题信息。我们分别在三个领先的LLM上实现了Tomcat的两个变种,即GPT-4o、DeepSeek-R1和Gemma-3-27B。为了评估Tomcat的有效性,我们进行了一个有52名人类参与者的研究,其中我们向参与者提供了与CP变种相同的信息。我们计算了意图准确性、行动最优性和规划最优性来衡量Tomcat和我们研究参与者的ToM能力。我们发现,Tomcat在Fs-CoT中,特别是GPT-4o和DeepSeek-R1上,表现与人类参与者相当,凸显了其在人机协作中的ToM潜力。

英文摘要:

Successful human-agent teaming relies on an agent being able to understand instructions given by a (human) principal. In many cases, an instruction may be incomplete or ambiguous. In such cases, the agent must infer the unspoken intentions from their shared context, that is, it must exercise the principal's Theory of Mind (ToM) and infer the mental states of its principal. We consider the prospects of effective human-agent collaboration using large language models (LLMs). To assess ToM in a dynamic, goal-oriented, and collaborative environment, we introduce a novel task, Instruction Inference, in which an agent assists a principal in reaching a goal by interpreting incomplete or ambiguous instructions. We present Tomcat, an LLM-based agent, designed to exhibit ToM reasoning in interpreting and responding to the principal's instructions. We implemented two variants of Tomcat. One, dubbed Fs-CoT (Fs for few-shot, CoT for chain-of-thought), is based on a small number of examples demonstrating the requisite structured reasoning. One, dubbed CP (commonsense prompt), relies on commonsense knowledge and information about the problem. We realized both variants of Tomcat on three leading LLMs, namely, GPT-4o, DeepSeek-R1, and Gemma-3-27B. To evaluate the effectiveness of Tomcat, we conducted a study with 52 human participants in which we provided participants with the same information as the CP variant. We computed intent accuracy, action optimality, and planning optimality to measure the ToM capabilities of Tomcat and our study participants. We found that Tomcat with Fs-CoT, particularly with GPT-4o and DeepSeek-R1, achieves performance comparable to the human participants, underscoring its ToM potential for human-agent collaboration.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑