arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2506.09331cs.CLcs.AIcs.MA
收藏

多智能体语言模型:推进合作、协调与适应

Multi-Agent Language Models: Advancing Cooperation, Coordination, and Adaptation

Polytechnique Montréal(蒙特利尔理工学院);Université de Montréal(蒙特利尔大学)

Arjun Vaithilingam Sudhakar

AI总结:

本研究通过合作性多智能体强化学习视角,探究大型语言模型的心理理论能力,旨在增强智能体与人工及人类伙伴的适应与合作,推动混合人机系统发展。

摘要:

现代大型语言模型(LLMs)在复杂的自然语言任务中展现出令人印象深刻的零样本和少样本泛化能力,使其作为虚拟助手广泛应用于翻译和摘要等多种场景。尽管仅在大规模文本语料上训练,且未对作者意图进行显式监督,LLMs 似乎能推断文本交互的潜在含义。这引发了一个根本性问题:LLMs 能否建模并推理他人的意图,即它们是否具备某种形式的心理理论?理解他人意图对于有效协作至关重要,而协作是人类社会成功的基础,也是包括人类和自主系统在内的多智能体之间合作互动的关键。在本工作中,我们通过合作性多智能体强化学习(MARL)的视角研究 LLMs 中的心理理论,其中智能体通过反复互动学习协作,模拟人类的社会推理。我们的方法旨在增强人工智能体与人工及人类伙伴适应和合作的能力。通过利用能够进行自然语言交互的基于 LLM 的智能体,我们朝着创建促进无缝协作的混合人机系统迈进,这对人机交互的未来具有广泛影响。

英文摘要:

Modern Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit impressive zero-shot and few-shot generalization capabilities across complex natural language tasks, enabling their widespread use as virtual assistants for diverse applications such as translation and summarization. Despite being trained solely on large corpora of text without explicit supervision on author intent, LLMs appear to infer the underlying meaning of textual interactions. This raises a fundamental question: can LLMs model and reason about the intentions of others, i.e., do they possess a form of theory of mind? Understanding other's intentions is crucial for effective collaboration, which underpins human societal success and is essential for cooperative interactions among multiple agents, including humans and autonomous systems. In this work, we investigate the theory of mind in LLMs through the lens of cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), where agents learn to collaborate via repeated interactions, mirroring human social reasoning. Our approach aims to enhance artificial agent's ability to adapt and cooperate with both artificial and human partners. By leveraging LLM-based agents capable of natural language interaction, we move towards creating hybrid human-AI systems that can foster seamless collaboration, with broad implications for the future of human-artificial interaction.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑