arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2503.03332astro-ph.SR
收藏

太阳磁能和螺旋度的谱

The spectra of solar magnetic energy and helicity

G. Kishore, Nishant K. Singh

AI总结:

本研究比较 HMI 和 SOLIS 磁图,发现太阳磁能和螺旋度谱的定性特征依赖于仪器,表明现有 synoptic magnetograms 不足以可靠用于 mean-field dynamos 研究。

摘要:

以往的研究使用磁能和螺旋度谱(后者使用 two-scale method 计算)来寻找 mean-field dynamos 的特征。在本研究中,我们比较同时期的 HMI 和 SOLIS 磁图,以说明即使是能量和螺旋度谱的定性特征也依赖于仪器。在太阳第 24 和 25 周之间的极小期附近,我们发现由 HMI 观测计算的磁能谱表现出两个不同的峰值。其中一个峰值仅出现在周期极小期附近,对应于高纬度的大尺度磁场。然而,这种磁场并不存在于同时期的 SOLIS synoptic vector magnetograms 中。此外,即使对两台仪器的磁图进行切趾处理,使用 two-scale method 计算的螺旋度谱也不一致(在 fractional helicity 的符号和数值上均如此)。这表明目前可用的 synoptic magnetograms 对于此类研究而言不够可靠。

英文摘要:

Previous studies have used magnetic energy and helicity spectra, the latter computed using the two-scale method, to search for signatures of mean-field dynamos. In this study, we compare cotemporal HMI and SOLIS magnetograms to illustrate the instrument-dependence of even qualitative features of the energy and helicity spectra. Around the minimum between solar cycles 24 and 25, we find that the magnetic energy spectrum computed from HMI observations exhibits two distinct peaks. One of these peaks is only present near the cycle minimum, and corresponds to large-scale magnetic fields at high latitudes. Nevertheless, such magnetic fields are not present in contemporaneous synoptic vector magnetograms from SOLIS. Further, even when magnetograms from both the instruments are apodized, the helicity spectra calculated using the two-scale method disagree (on both the sign and the value of the fractional helicity). This suggests that currently available synoptic magnetograms are not reliable enough for such studies.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑