arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2502.03272eess.IVcs.AIcs.CV

用于从临床心脏MR扫描中全自动心肌梗死分割的深度学习流水线

Deep Learning Pipeline for Fully Automated Myocardial Infarct Segmentation from Clinical Cardiac MR Scans

Medical University of Innsbruck(因斯布鲁克医科大学);University of Innsbruck(因斯布鲁克大学)

Matthias Schwab, Mathias Pamminger, Christian Kremser, Markus Haltmeier, Agnes Mayr

AI总结:

本研究提出一种基于二维、三维CNNs的级联深度学习框架,可全自动从LGE CMR图像分割心肌梗死,梗死分割质量媲美甚至优于人工,仅MVO分割仍逊于人工,为临床应用提供可能。

摘要:

目的:开发并评估一种基于深度学习的方法,以全自动方式完成心肌梗死分割。\n材料与方法:本回顾性研究采用由二维和三维卷积神经网络(CNNs)组成的级联框架,专门用于识别晚期钆增强(LGE)心脏磁共振(CMR)图像上的缺血性心肌瘢痕,该框架在包含144例检查的内部训练数据集上完成训练。在来自同一机构的独立测试数据集(包含2021年至2023年间获取的152例检查图像)上,对基于人工智能(AI)的分割结果与手动分割结果进行了定量比较。此外,由两名CMR专家在盲法实验中,对人工生成和AI生成的轮廓的分割准确性进行了定性评估。\n结果:手动计算与自动计算的梗死体积之间具有极佳的一致性($ρ_c$ = 0.9)。定性评估显示,与基于人工的测量结果相比,专家认为AI分割结果更能准确反映梗死实际范围的比例显著更高(p < 0.001),具体占比为AI占33.4%、人工占25.1%、两者相当占41.5%。相反,在微血管阻塞(MVO)分割方面,人工测量结果仍更受青睐,占比为AI占11.3%、人工占55.6%、两者相当占33.1%。\n结论:这种全自动分割流水线可在极短时间内计算CMR梗死面积,无需对输入图像进行任何预处理,且分割质量可与训练有素的人工观察者相媲美。在盲法实验中,专家更偏好自动梗死分割结果的比例高于手动分割,为其潜在临床应用铺平了道路。

英文摘要:

Purpose: To develop and evaluate a deep learning-based method that allows to perform myocardial infarct segmentation in a fully-automated way. Materials and Methods: For this retrospective study, a cascaded framework of two and three-dimensional convolutional neural networks (CNNs), specialized on identifying ischemic myocardial scars on late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images, was trained on an in-house training dataset consisting of 144 examinations. On a separate test dataset from the same institution, including images from 152 examinations obtained between 2021 and 2023, a quantitative comparison between artificial intelligence (AI)-based segmentations and manual segmentations was performed. Further, qualitative assessment of segmentation accuracy was evaluated for both human and AI-generated contours by two CMR experts in a blinded experiment. Results: Excellent agreement could be found between manually and automatically calculated infarct volumes ($ρ_c$ = 0.9). The qualitative evaluation showed that compared to human-based measurements, the experts rated the AI-based segmentations to better represent the actual extent of infarction significantly (p < 0.001) more often (33.4% AI, 25.1% human, 41.5% equal). On the contrary, for segmentation of microvascular obstruction (MVO), manual measurements were still preferred (11.3% AI, 55.6% human, 33.1% equal). Conclusion: This fully-automated segmentation pipeline enables CMR infarct size to be calculated in a very short time and without requiring any pre-processing of the input images while matching the segmentation quality of trained human observers. In a blinded experiment, experts preferred automated infarct segmentations more often than manual segmentations, paving the way for a potential clinical application.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑